On 30/06/11 11:55, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Richard Fairhurst
Jonathan Harley wrote:
Really I'm at a loss to see the point of the share-alike clause (4.4).
I can't think of a use-case for OSM where processing the database
doesn't reduce the amount of information.
On 01/07/11 09:43, Tobias Knerr wrote:
The only motivation for data SA I can somewhat understand is to open up
data that can be contributed back to OSM.
Sharealike is meant to guarantee that the individual users of the
produced work have the same freedom to work with the data as the person
On 01/07/11 10:51, Jonathan Harley wrote:
I think anyone who thought ODbL satisfies this case would be being
naive. It's so easy to dodge really giving anything back in many
different ways, including (off the top of my head): combining OSM with
additional contents in the form of already
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Harley j...@spiffymap.net
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Exception in Open DataLicense/Community
Guidelines for temporary file
On 30/06/11
Rob Myers wrote:
On 01/07/11 09:43, Tobias Knerr wrote:
The only motivation for data SA I can somewhat understand is to open up
data that can be contributed back to OSM.
Sharealike is meant to guarantee that the individual users of the
produced work have the same freedom to work with the
2011/7/1 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
Most of these concerns could be alleviated by dual-licensing under both ODbL
and CC-BY-SA.
I'm not fond of the ODbL and would be happy with a CT + CC-BY-SA
solution (it could achieve most of the declared aims of CT + ODbL and
avoid most of the
jynus wrote:
Dual licensing has a really big problem for the project:
1) We release the data under CC OR ODbL
2) A third party uses data under only one of the licenses
3) Even if they are both ShareAlike, the transformations made by
third party cannot be returned to OSM, as they are
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Exception in Open DataLicense/Community
Guidelines for temporary file
Jonathan Harley wrote:
Really I'm
