Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing the license

2011-12-13 Thread Erik Johansson
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 17:08, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote: We have had a request for another big open organisation to re-use our contributor terms [1] and summary [2] . Both the terms and the summary are by default already published under CC-BY-SA 2.0.  However, my initial

[OSM-legal-talk] Licensing the license

2011-12-12 Thread Michael Collinson
We have had a request for another big open organisation to re-use our contributor terms [1] and summary [2] . Both the terms and the summary are by default already published under CC-BY-SA 2.0. However, my initial thought it that it is more practical to (also) offer them under a license that

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing the license

2011-12-12 Thread Rob Myers
On 12/12/11 16:08, Michael Collinson wrote: We have had a request for another big open organisation to re-use our contributor terms [1] and summary [2] . Both the terms and the summary are by default already published under CC-BY-SA 2.0. However, my initial thought it that it is more