Re: [OSM-legal-talk] "Produced Work" guideline working

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Mike Collinson wrote: >> "If it was intended for the extraction of the original data, then it >> is a database and not a Produced Work. Otherwise it is a Produced >> Work. >> >> We can clearly define things that are USUALLY Produced Works: .

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] "Produced Work" guideline working

Hi, 80n wrote: > Actually I think the duck test http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test is the > simplest way of approaching this problem. If someone treats something as a > database then its a database. Otherwise its a produced work. > > They can call it whatever they like when the publish it.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] "Produced Work" guideline working

Actually I think the duck test http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test is the simplest way of approaching this problem. If someone treats something as a database then its a database. Otherwise its a produced work. They can call it whatever they like when the publish it. The duck test kicks in wh

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] "Produced Work" guideline working

Hi, Mike Collinson wrote: > "If it was intended for the extraction of the original data, then it > is a database and not a Produced Work. Otherwise it is a Produced > Work. > > We can clearly define things that are USUALLY Produced Works: .PNG, > JPG, .PDF, SVG images and any raster image; a map

[OSM-legal-talk] "Produced Work" guideline working

Following up from the discussion on this mailing list, the License Working Group have come up with the wording below and at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Produced_Work_-_Guideline This is a str