Am 06.05.2014 21:40, schrieb Rob Myers:
On 05/05/14 09:16 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
We have raised the question of Dynamic Data in a dedicated guideline
given that a number of things are not so clear and even while, using the
example from the guideline, the occupancy of a parking lot is an
On 07/05/2014 08:20, Simon Poole wrote:
[..] Does it depend on how the match OSM parking
lot id - proprietary parking lot id is done ?
In this thread, we have seen a few mentions of the implementation as the
ultimate factor in discriminating the resulting database between
derivative and
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
I hope we (as in the LWG) are not creating the impression that we are
trying to assemble as many loop holes as possible, it is more
identifying some of the edge cases and trying to document the community
consensus on the
On 05/05/14 09:16 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
We have raised the question of Dynamic Data in a dedicated guideline
given that a number of things are not so clear and even while, using the
example from the guideline, the occupancy of a parking lot is an
observable fact it is questionable if we
Am 05.05.2014 06:38, schrieb Rob Myers:
..
But the license doesn't exist to collect data for OSM.
..
True, but our immediate, admittedly egoistic, interest is that we are
free to use any improvements (in a wide sense of the word) to OSM data
and that derivatives of OSM remain free.
2014-05-05 14:05 GMT+02:00 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
*And share-alike only applies to what we collect.*
Let me first say that this is a brilliantly clear way to put it. I like
this a lot.
I believe this is somehow more limiting than what we actually might want.
E.g. we don't
On 05/05/2014 16:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-05-05 14:05 GMT+02:00 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de
mailto:o...@tobias-knerr.de:
*And share-alike only applies to what we collect.*
Let me first say that this is a brilliantly clear way to put it. I
like
this a lot.
Hi,
On 05.05.2014 16:39, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
I believe this is somehow more limiting than what we actually might
want. E.g. we don't collect traffic data, but if there was a company
which used our data as basemap and associated average speeds for time
spans to our graph (e.g.
On 05/05/2014 16:47, Frederik Ramm wrote:
the use case sketched here went far beyond simply displaying an
overlay; this use case was about snapping speed recordings to OSM
street data to find out which street the recording was for in the
first place, thereby creating a derivative database.
On 05/05/2014 17:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
no, this was not about overlaying 2 graphical layers but about joining
the data into one layer (necessary I guess, in order to perform
routing). [..]
Usage may be different, but the data is the same: ways with an
hypothetical 'speed' attribute
2014-05-05 17:42 GMT+02:00 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Usage may be different, but the data is the same: ways with an
hypothetical 'speed' attribute added to them in the persistent database of
your choice. Whether you use that joined data to perform Dijkstra stunts or
just render it
While I think the case of the traffic data is interesting, it really
very much depends on implementation details if and when a derivative DB
might be created.
For example if weights were calculated from the data and associated
directly with OSM ways then likely you would have a derivative DB,
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
On 05/05/2014 17:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
no, this was not about overlaying 2 graphical layers but about joining the
data into one layer (necessary I guess, in order to perform routing). [..]
Usage may be different, but
On 03/05/14 08:51 AM, Michael Collinson wrote:
Geocoding: So I have to share a patient's medical record because it is
geocoded against OSM?
Who with?
Dynamic Data: So if I use OpenStreetMap car park location data, I have
to share the real-time occupancy data?
Who with?
Algorithmic
I've renamed the subject because it has gone way off topic, but I wanted
to come back on Tobias' comment because it struck a chord and I would
like to share a personal research topic. I am curious to evolve the idea
further to see if there is any positive value.
Open data is a different
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
Open data is a different animal to software source code and highly-creative
works and I suspect it will [be] a few more years yet until we understand it
all
fully.
Sure. Of course, we are part of why it is a big deal
16 matches
Mail list logo
