On 17/02/14 11:33 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
Many of the companies failing to meet attribution requirements are using
OpenStreetMap data for the majority of their map data, and sometimes have
no attribution at all. The OpenStreetMap requirements are less onerous than
alternative commercial
is about how difficult it is for some people
to give away something and get nothing in return.
Regards, Gert Gremmen, BSc
Van: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch]
Verzonden: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:01 PM
Aan: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
[mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 4:47 AM
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Attribution Requirements
The thing is that for us, for OpenStreetMap, the attribution is our
Am 13.01.2014 13:17, schrieb Jonathan Harley:
.
given that the OSM attribution is given equal prominence with their
own Terms and their imagery attribution. (By the way, Alex and Eric
from MapBox are members of this mailing list.) Surely should be given
equal prominence with the map
Am 14/gen/2014 um 10:54 schrieb Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
a IMHO good
example of what we want http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contact/spaces/
no mention of ODbL and the attribution three screens after the map (on mobile,
maybe this looks different on a desktop)?
cheers,
Martin
I don't actually get a map (tested with three different mobile
browsers), now I don't think we want to take our requirements so far
that we want OSM attribution on everything :-)
Am 14.01.2014 12:38, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 14/gen/2014 um 10:54 schrieb Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
a
Am 14.01.2014 14:28, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2014/1/14 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch mailto:si...@poole.ch
I don't actually get a map (tested with three different mobile
browsers), now I don't think we want to take our requirements so
far that we want OSM attribution on
t: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 3:12 PMTo: Martin Koppenhoefer; Licensing and other legal discussions.Reply To: Licensing and other legal discussions.Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Attribution Requirements
Am 14.01.2014 14:28, schrieb Martin
Ko
On 10/01/14 12:01, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 10.01.2014 07:15, schrieb Clifford Snow:
I like the Mapbox solution the author mentions of putting a box on
the map to take you to another page. I realize that unless the user
clicks on the link, they will never discover that OSM contributed to
Jonathan,
On 13.01.2014 13:17, Jonathan Harley wrote:
What would happen if every data source started mandating
that our attribution must be in the corner?
The thing is that for us, for OpenStreetMap, the attribution is our main
remuneration. We give our data away for free but in return, we
On 13.01.2014 18:06, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Jonathan,
On 13.01.2014 13:17, Jonathan Harley wrote:
What would happen if every data source started mandating
that our attribution must be in the corner?
The thing is that for us, for OpenStreetMap, the attribution is our main
remuneration. We give
Hi,
On 13.01.2014 22:52, Stephan Knauss wrote:
As long as other map suppliers like Google and
Bing are happy by being only credited on a separate page,
Are they?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
On 13.01.2014 23:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 13.01.2014 22:52, Stephan Knauss wrote:
As long as other map suppliers like Google and
Bing are happy by being only credited on a separate page,
Are they?
No idea. Do their terms allow to use the tiles directly without using
their own JS-API which
Am 10/gen/2014 um 13:01 schrieb Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
And I'm very tired of people trying to weasel around the absolute minimal
requirements we pose on reuse of OSM data.
like APPL?
;-)
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
Apple does not, as far as we know, use OSM data ODbL licensed by the
foundation.
Simon
Am 12.01.2014 13:06, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 10/gen/2014 um 13:01 schrieb Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
And I'm very tired of people trying to weasel around the absolute minimal
requirements we
2014/1/12 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
Apple does not, as far as we know, use OSM data ODbL licensed by the
foundation.
yes, they are supposedly ignoring former requirements (still valid for
older data).
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
Simon Poole simon@... writes:
Am 10.01.2014 07:15, schrieb Clifford Snow:
I
like the Mapbox solution the author mentions of putting a box
on the map to take you to another page. I realize that unless
the user clicks on the link, they will never
That are not the last board minutes as you know, there are:
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_Minutes_2013-12-10
Am 11.01.2014 10:07, schrieb Jukka Rahkonen:
Simon Poole simon@... writes:
Am 10.01.2014 07:15, schrieb Clifford Snow:
I
like the Mapbox
Simon Poole simon@... writes:
That are not the last board minutes as you know, there are:
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_Minutes_2013-12-10
It is not my pleasure to ask stupid questions but I had a black out even you
clearly wrote See the last board minutes. I
Am 10.01.2014 07:15, schrieb Clifford Snow:
I like the Mapbox solution the author mentions of putting a box on the
map to take you to another page. I realize that unless the user clicks
on the link, they will never discover that OSM contributed to this
product. Since OSM may be only one of
20 matches
Mail list logo
