I feel that it is not safe at this point. I have raised my concerns in
this thread
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-December/005299.html
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Manuel Reimer
manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de wrote:
Hello,
is it secure to use Bing? Any license risks?
Andrew, Manuel -
On 12/06/2010 10:28 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I feel that it is not safe at this point. I have raised my concerns in
this thread
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-December/005299.html
The situation is sufficient for me to use Bing imagery for tracing.
On 12/06/2010 10:18 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I suppose I don't mind if a license is technically invalid because of
some obscure legal reason, I just think that the intent needs to be
there, publicly, officially, and clearly stated on what they are okay
with and what they aren't. I don't think
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
pec...@gmail.com wrote:
License is fine. It is CT which in fact still allows OSMF to change
data license to any other free license (which could be strip share
alike and attribution requirements) what blocks
Hello,
first, to put things clear, I know of Transiki, I know of Google Transit
obviously, I know of OSMand, and I know - a little - about database
copyright in France. I already asked several lawyers about my questions,
without it resulting in any clear answer. And no, what I intend to do will
On 6 December 2010 20:57, Andrei Klochko transportspl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
strategy, to avoid trouble. Any advice on such an entreprise?
I'm not sure that this is really on topic for this list since it
doesn't impact legally on open street map (or it shouldn't). Its also
the kind
Hi,
I am sorry, you are right, based on what I said, this conversation hardly
concerns osm directly. I asked before I did not know where to start getting
real help about this. And so, thank you for your answer. It finally got into
the heart of the subject.
I never thought of that point, that
