Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
CONDITIONS FOR TIMSC TO RELICENSE HIS DATA (Version 1)
This is an interesting document and the first time that I have seen
*anybody*, including past and present members of OSMF board, draft such
a detailed code of conduct if you will.
There are some ideas in
Frederik Ramm frederik@... writes:
I suggest that TimSC's attempt at negotiation be categorically
rejected without further ado; he should be treated exactly the same as
any other mapper and if he doesn't reconsider then his contributions
will have to be removed and, where desirable,
Andrew said
I live and map in London and some of my contributions would be flushed down
the pan if Tim declines to relicense. I agree completely with Frederik.
Exactly.
In all this kerfuffle the only important thing is the CT. With them
collaborative mapping is possible. Without them, as
The problems with the CC-BY-SA license are fully hypothetical,
as there have been no real life problems.
There have been some hesitations at commercial users of OSM data
with the Share Alike part, but OSM is not bound to enforce the SA part
of the current license either, so we could just allow
Gert Gremmen wrote:
Some of us try to minimize the number of refused CT (about
400) but I have the strong feeling that those are mainly found
in the old core of the first 1000 of OSM mappers, the founders
that were interested in real free data.
Wut?
AFAIK the three contributors with the
