On 09/16/2010 02:19 AM, Dave F. wrote:
On 16/09/2010 01:12, John Smith wrote:
This happens all the time, new CDs are released of out of copyright
music that copy is then re-protected.
Would that protection only apply to the physical characteristics of the
CD, such as printed inlay sleeves?
On 09/16/2010 01:07 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The question is, how much do I have to do with that file before I can
legally (or, if someone fancies going into that, morally) claim a
copyright. What if I convert line endings or use an automated process to
convert from one character set to another
On 16 September 2010 19:29, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 16/09/2010 16:43, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
If it isn't will this mean previous traced/imported Opendata will have to
be removed?
If the incompatibilities in the licenses / CTs are not resolved before
the OSM license
On 17 September 2010 05:25, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
This clashes with the legal advice giving to the Licensing Working
Group in that OS OpenData's license _is_ compatible with ODbL and the
Contributor Terms. Specifically section 4 of the Contributor Terms
provides a
On 09/16/2010 08:45 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 17 September 2010 05:25, Grant Slateropenstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
This clashes with the legal advice giving to the Licensing Working
Group in that OS OpenData's license _is_ compatible with ODbL and the
Contributor Terms. Specifically section
On 17 September 2010 06:06, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
4. At Your or the copyright holder’s option, OSMF agrees to attribute You
or the copyright holder. A mechanism will be provided, currently a web page
[...]
The way that it allows attribution satisfies BY-SA 2.5+ as well as the
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.comwrote:
On 16 September 2010 19:29, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 16/09/2010 16:43, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
If it isn't will this mean previous traced/imported Opendata will have
to
be removed?
On 17 September 2010 06:36, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
If you mean the licence of OSM, that would clash with section 4 of the CTs.
In that case, Section 3 clashes with 4, since there is no minimum
requirement of attribution.
If you mean a produced work, that would clash with section
On 16 September 2010 21:26, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com
wrote:
This clashes with the legal advice giving to the Licensing Working
Group in that OS OpenData's license _is_ compatible with ODbL and the
Contributor Terms.
Isn't section 4 there so if the licence is changed in the future (section 3)
that attribution is needed in a future licence.
Markus_g
-Original Message-
From: legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of John Smith
Sent: Friday, 17
10 matches
Mail list logo
