Hi,
On 06/29/11 05:21, James Livingston wrote:
I don't think it would be treated differently, because I believe that an
in-memory data structure would still be a database (in the ODbL and
database right sense of database). I don't see how the storage
mechanism makes a difference.
Would you
On 29/06/2011, at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 06/29/11 05:21, James Livingston wrote:
I don't think it would be treated differently, because I believe that an
in-memory data structure would still be a database (in the ODbL and
database right sense of database). I don't see how the storage
I moved the multiple licensing site out of beta. You cannot not revoke
licenses once they are accepted. I hope it will be useful.
http://timsc.dev.openstreetmap.org/extralicenses/
Tim
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Hi Tom,
Sure they won't be able to edit now until they accept, but we consider
that a reasonable step to try and move forward with the licensing process.
OK, then let me rephrase my concern using your language: „The CT make the
voting right dependent upon being able to edit. This gives the
On 29/06/11 15:59, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer wrote:
Hi Tom,
Asking us to block everybody for six months so a vote could be rigged
would clearly be unreasonable and would be ignored.
Where do I find the sysadmin policy for evaluating whether a blocking request
is considered „unreasonable“?
Hi,
Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer wrote:
I once made a constructive proposal for one potential way to fix the problem,
which was met both with well-grounded criticism and with personal attacks.
Care to point out the latter?
If I were to say that I'm beginning to think you must have a very skewed
Hi,
James Livingston wrote:
If I use software that builds an in-memory data structure which you
believe to be a database in order to make a produced work, how
would you suggest that I fulfil my obligation to make such derived
database available on request?
I have absolutely no idea. It's one
If I use software that builds an in-memory data structure which you
believe to be a database in order to make a produced work, how
would you suggest that I fulfil my obligation to make such derived
database available on request?
I have absolutely no idea. It's one of the many things I
What's wrong with asking everyone AGAIN ?
If something is wrong, then it cannot be difficult to correct.
If a youg organization as OSM is not flexible, who the hell on earth IS ?
Or even better, let the community choose what CT/LICENSE is best.
Email is free, and a voting webtool is available
Hi,
Kai Krueger wrote:
If, on the other hand, out of the black box comes a derived database,
then you can simply share *that* database and nobody cares what happened
in the black box, because you only have to share the last in a chain of
derived databases that leads to a produced work, right?
Tom Hughes-3 wrote:
If you have a better way of defining active contributor that is
workable then please tell us what it is.
One could have given voting rights to all people who have once reached
active contributor status and retain sufficient interest in the project to
keep their email
Kai Krueger wrote:
Am I allowed to declare my png mapnik tile as a derived database, stick an
ODbL label on it an be done with it?
Then I don't have to reverse engineer my render to figure out if or if not
it produces an internal database and worry about having to maintaining a
snapshot of
Frederik Ramm wrote:
If, on the other hand, out of the black box comes a derived database,
then you can simply share *that* database and nobody cares what
happened in the black box, because you only have to share the last
in a chain of derived databases that leads to a produced work, right?
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
The Directive says a database
[snip Richard's quote and replace mine from
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31996L0009:EN:HTML]
Article 1
Scope
1. This Directive concerns the legal protection of databases in any form.
2. For the
14 matches
Mail list logo
