On 25 August 2011 02:00, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> This is a different topic but last I heard the CT don't assure
> everything you upload is ODbL compatible, but rather than "your
> contribution" is compatible with all the licenses that may be chosen
> by OSMF -- and that everything you uploade
On 8/24/2011 8:56 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
But probably the buck would stop with the OSMF. Distributing data just
because somebody on the web said it was PD has a high likelihood of being
considered negligent.
You need to search around for "safe harbor provisions".
Steve
Simon
Am 24.08.201
Well one solution is very simple: just contribute stuff that you mapped
yourself,
and hey presto, 99.9% of all problems vanish (including any issues with
agreeing to
the CTs).
Simon
Am 24.08.2011 19:34, schrieb ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen:
Simon said:
>Distributing data j
Simon said:
>Distributing data just
>because somebody on the web said it was PD has a high likelihood of
being
>considered negligent.
Then distributing data because someone on the web has stated that
is was CT/ODBL compliant is even negligent.
If you do not provide a set of tool
Am 24.08.2011 16:09, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
...
One of the PD-but-not-CT-people said something like "I don't want to
give any kind of explicit assurance/permission to OSMF". I.e. they
don't want a contract with OSMF. But I think that could be remedied by
offering them a differently worded de
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> There's a curious statement in the LWG minutes for 2nd August
> (https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_1252tt382df).
>
>> Folks who have declined the new contributor terms but said their
>> contributions are public domain.
>>
>> There
Hi,
On 08/24/11 16:03, Simon Poole wrote:
I think I've said this before, but any way you look at it, there is a big
difference between TimSC and the US Census Bureau. I just can't
see how we could use a mappers data without some kind of assurance
that the mapper actually has the rights necessary
Signing (clicking) the CT explicitly transfers the
liability of the suitability to the contributor,
where declaring PD does not.
The Board wants us to sign a contract with them.
It's not about data but about compliance.
Regards,
Gert Gremmen,
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Richar
I think I've said this before, but any way you look at it, there is a big
difference between TimSC and the US Census Bureau. I just can't
see how we could use a mappers data without some kind of assurance
that the mapper actually has the rights necessary to make their
contributions PD or a simila
There's a curious statement in the LWG minutes for 2nd August
(https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_1252tt382df).
> Folks who have declined the new contributor terms but said their
> contributions are public domain.
>
> There has been a suggestion that such contributions should be
> maintained
I've fixed another issue that distorted the overall numbers (the per
user stats were correct), regenerated
everything with the current full history dump (from June), and added a
couple of further countries.
Overall, the situation seems to be substantially better than I would
have expected, t
11 matches
Mail list logo
