2014/1/14 pmsg
> can we use Corine Land Cover data? I think not, but I would
> be grateful to be tought something different.
>
I think it depends on the country, AFAIK this is not one big dataset but
several datasets, with different licensing according to the contributing
country.
Cheers,
Marti
Hi,
> From: Martin Koppenhoefer
> legal issues aside my concern is that Corine Data is not suitable
> technically for OSM: the resolution is too low and not compatible with the
> rest of our data.
I don't want to import Corine Land Cover data. I would like the Wiki
to be correct, though.
So ca
On my mobile browser the attribution is between the Questions & Feedback links and the Get Mozilla Updates box near the bottom of the page. It reads "Maps © by MapBox and OpenStreetMap contributors"-Kevin
Am 14.01.2014 14:28, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> 2014/1/14 Simon Poole mailto:si...@poole.ch>>
>
> I don't actually get a map (tested with three different mobile
> browsers), now I don't think we want to take our requirements so
> far that we want OSM attribution on "everything" :
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> I agree. Importing Corine is a big mistake for any OSM community. The best
> way to use Corine is to make a rendered Corine layer, and then use that to
> help with mapping.
blablabla, always the same song. Like if a blank page is better tha
I don't actually get a map (tested with three different mobile
browsers), now I don't think we want to take our requirements so far
that we want OSM attribution on "everything" :-)
Am 14.01.2014 12:38, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>
>> Am 14/gen/2014 um 10:54 schrieb Simon Poole :
>>
>> a IMHO g
> Am 14/gen/2014 um 10:54 schrieb Simon Poole :
>
> a IMHO good
> example of what we want http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contact/spaces/
no mention of ODbL and the attribution three screens after the map (on mobile,
maybe this looks different on a desktop)?
cheers,
Martin
_
Am 13.01.2014 13:17, schrieb Jonathan Harley:
.
> given that the OSM attribution is given equal prominence with their
> own Terms and their imagery attribution. (By the way, Alex and Eric
> from MapBox are members of this mailing list.) Surely "should be given
> equal prominence with the map
