Am 27.02.2014 01:03, schrieb Luis Villa:
...
Note that this is a substantially different task for 4.0 than for 3.0,
because 4.0 (particularly BY-SA) now includes a database copyleft
clause. Assessing how the ODBL and CC BY-SA 4.0 database clauses
interact will be challenging. OSM/Open Data
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Diane Mercier diane.merc...@gmail.comwrote:
I reiterate. It is the responsibility of OSM Foundation to instruct his
community of his CC 4.0 interpretation as it has done for the CC 2.0 and CC
3.0
And in my humble opinion, the tiles and the BD licenses should
Municipalities and government of Québec will adopt the CC BY 4.0
Diane
Le 2014-02-21 07:04, Simon Poole a écrit :
This is I believe a simple misunderstanding:
le...@osmfoundation.org is the internal list of the LWG
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org is the legal discussion mailing list open
to
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Eh good news for OSM-Quebec community then. Let's wait for the official
confirmation of the exact license adopted.
I disagree.
Any license drafted or adopted by a Canadian government, other than a
no-restrictions,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Eh good news for OSM-Quebec community then. Let's wait for the official
confirmation of the exact license adopted.
I disagree.
Any license
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Mike Linksvayer m...@gondwanaland.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
[ ... ]
Again, any government open data publication in Canada must be licensed
ODC-PDDL, or else it is a not-open-enough-closed-data-failure.
CC BY 3.0 and earlier had onerous attribution requirements for data. I believe
4.0 fixes this. I don't think anyone has suggested contacting a data provider
who's licensed under CC 4.0 licenses to clarify attribution.
The issue with 3.0 attribution are not purely theoretical, there have been
