On 17/02/14 11:33 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>
> Many of the companies failing to meet attribution requirements are using
> OpenStreetMap data for the majority of their map data, and sometimes have
> no attribution at all. The OpenStreetMap requirements are less onerous than
> alternative commercial s
> From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
[mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 4:47 AM
> To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Attribution Requirements
>
> > The thing is that for us, for OpenStreetMa
s mail list, and the first topic
I read today is about how difficult it is for some people
to give away something and get nothing in return.
Regards, Gert Gremmen, BSc
Van: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch]
Verzonden: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:01 PM
Aan: legal-talk@openstre
imon PooleSent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 3:12 PMTo: Martin Koppenhoefer; Licensing and other legal discussions.Reply To: Licensing and other legal discussions.Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Attribution Requirements
Am 14.01.2014 14:28, schrieb Martin
Am 14.01.2014 14:28, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> 2014/1/14 Simon Poole mailto:si...@poole.ch>>
>
> I don't actually get a map (tested with three different mobile
> browsers), now I don't think we want to take our requirements so
> far that we want OSM attribution on "everything" :
I don't actually get a map (tested with three different mobile
browsers), now I don't think we want to take our requirements so far
that we want OSM attribution on "everything" :-)
Am 14.01.2014 12:38, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>
>> Am 14/gen/2014 um 10:54 schrieb Simon Poole :
>>
>> a IMHO g
> Am 14/gen/2014 um 10:54 schrieb Simon Poole :
>
> a IMHO good
> example of what we want http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contact/spaces/
no mention of ODbL and the attribution three screens after the map (on mobile,
maybe this looks different on a desktop)?
cheers,
Martin
_
Am 13.01.2014 13:17, schrieb Jonathan Harley:
.
> given that the OSM attribution is given equal prominence with their
> own Terms and their imagery attribution. (By the way, Alex and Eric
> from MapBox are members of this mailing list.) Surely "should be given
> equal prominence with the map
On 13.01.2014 23:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 13.01.2014 22:52, Stephan Knauss wrote:
As long as other map suppliers like Google and
Bing are happy by being only credited on a separate page,
Are they?
No idea. Do their terms allow to use the tiles directly without using
their own JS-API which
Hi,
On 13.01.2014 22:52, Stephan Knauss wrote:
> As long as other map suppliers like Google and
> Bing are happy by being only credited on a separate page,
Are they?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
_
On 13.01.2014 18:06, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Jonathan,
On 13.01.2014 13:17, Jonathan Harley wrote:
What would happen if every data source started mandating
that "our attribution must be in the corner"?
The thing is that for us, for OpenStreetMap, the attribution is our main
remuneration. We give
Jonathan,
On 13.01.2014 13:17, Jonathan Harley wrote:
> What would happen if every data source started mandating
> that "our attribution must be in the corner"?
The thing is that for us, for OpenStreetMap, the attribution is our main
remuneration. We give our data away for free but in return, we
On 10/01/14 12:01, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 10.01.2014 07:15, schrieb Clifford Snow:
I like the Mapbox solution the author mentions of putting a box on
the map to take you to another page. I realize that unless the user
clicks on the link, they will never discover that OSM contributed to
this
2014/1/12 Simon Poole
> Apple does not, as far as we know, use OSM data ODbL licensed by the
> foundation.
yes, they are supposedly ignoring former requirements (still valid for
older data).
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@open
Apple does not, as far as we know, use OSM data ODbL licensed by the
foundation.
Simon
Am 12.01.2014 13:06, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 10/gen/2014 um 13:01 schrieb Simon Poole :
And I'm very tired of people trying to weasel around the absolute minimal
requirements we pose on reuse of
> Am 10/gen/2014 um 13:01 schrieb Simon Poole :
>
> And I'm very tired of people trying to weasel around the absolute minimal
> requirements we pose on reuse of OSM data.
like APPL?
;-)
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstr
Simon Poole writes:
>
> That are not the last board minutes as you know, there are:
>
> http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_Minutes_2013-12-10
>
It is not my pleasure to ask stupid questions but I had a black out even you
clearly wrote "See the last board minutes". I apologize. G
That are not the last board minutes as you know, there are:
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_Minutes_2013-12-10
Am 11.01.2014 10:07, schrieb Jukka Rahkonen:
> Simon Poole writes:
>
>
>> Am 10.01.2014 07:15, schrieb Clifford Snow:
>> I
>> like the Mapbox solu
Simon Poole writes:
> Am 10.01.2014 07:15, schrieb Clifford Snow:
> I
> like the Mapbox solution the author mentions of putting a box
> on the map to take you to another page. I realize that unless
> the user clicks on the link, they will never discover
Am 10.01.2014 07:15, schrieb Clifford Snow:
>
>
> I like the Mapbox solution the author mentions of putting a box on the
> map to take you to another page. I realize that unless the user clicks
> on the link, they will never discover that OSM contributed to this
> product. Since OSM may be only on
I received a message from Tableau Software. First a little info about
Tableau Software and OSM. Tableau Software is a user of OSM data,
contributor and has sponsored OSM events. Because of the size of the
message blow is a link to the text of the message. [1] I've summarized
their questions below,
21 matches
Mail list logo