Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Frederik Ramm
frede...@remote.org wrote:
This rule means that everything that is traced from Bing before OSM
stops
publishing under CC-BY-SA will be available to the world, forever,
under
CC-BY-SA. But a hypothetical CC-BY-SA fork would
I certainly didn't read it that way. The Bing license says you must
contribute traced data to openstreetmaps.org, but it doesn't say you
can't also contribute traced data to a fork.
After it has been contributed to openstreetmap.org, one can get it from
openstreetmap.org(dump maybe)
On 23 December 2010 00:42, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
This interpretation (or at least, the acceptance of it as something
OSM would want to do) is truly evil. I only wonder how widespread it
is among OSM contributors. I hope in good faith that it is held by
very few.
After turning the
On 22 December 2010 15:18, Niklas Cholmkvist towards...@gmail.com wrote:
Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Frederik Ramm
frede...@remote.org wrote:
This rule means that everything that is traced from Bing before OSM
stops
publishing under CC-BY-SA will be available to the
Dave,
Dave F. wrote:
I'm just catching up with this thread can't believe what I've just
read. You bleat whinge
... thanks ...
about people talking legal in other threads
yet here, in legal, you admit that your advice to others that's it's OK
to trace Bing (under any license) has no
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 19/12/10 10:30, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Where is this direct statement from Microsoft that says derived
information from aerial imagery delivered through their map api can be
licensed under a CT compatible license?
For the record
1) I accept that the Microsoft Licence[1] to use Bing imagery is an early
version, and we have been told it will be revised
2) I suspect that Microsoft do intend that Bing imagery may be used to
update OSM
However:
- Original Message -
From: Rob Myers
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.comwrote:
On 19 December 2010 14:40, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
The licence PDF states:
Any updates you make to the OpenStreetMap map via the
Application (even if not published to third parties) must
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:32 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words, this license makes no grants of rights to publish derived
works
under any particular license, over and above what was already there.
That's probably a combination of the fact that Microsoft doesn't own
that right in
- Original Message -
From: Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone already had a look at the Bing Terms
of Use?
On 12/19/2010 02:40 PM, David Groom wrote:
For the record
1) I
Dave F. writes:
On 06/12/2010 09:55, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The situation is sufficient for me to use Bing imagery for tracing.
I'm not looking at the legal side of it, I'm just looking at the size
of the PR disaster should Microsoft attempt to backtrack in any way.
PR is more
On 06/12/2010 09:55, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The situation is sufficient for me to use Bing imagery for tracing.
I'm not looking at the legal side of it, I'm just looking at the size
of the PR disaster should Microsoft attempt to backtrack in any way.
PR is more important than legal.
I'm
I feel that it is not safe at this point. I have raised my concerns in
this thread
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-December/005299.html
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Manuel Reimer
manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de wrote:
Hello,
is it secure to use Bing? Any license risks?
Andrew, Manuel -
On 12/06/2010 10:28 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I feel that it is not safe at this point. I have raised my concerns in
this thread
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-December/005299.html
The situation is sufficient for me to use Bing imagery for tracing.
On 12/06/2010 10:18 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I suppose I don't mind if a license is technically invalid because of
some obscure legal reason, I just think that the intent needs to be
there, publicly, officially, and clearly stated on what they are okay
with and what they aren't. I don't think
Hello,
is it secure to use Bing? Any license risks? Could Microsoft, at some day, just
force us to remove everything with source=Bing on it? Am I forced to have this
source tag there? Should stuff, taken from Bing, be verified via GPS track at
some time to get the data secure?
One risk,
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 11:16, Manuel Reimer a écrit :
is it secure to use Bing? Any license risks? Could Microsoft, at some
day, just force us to remove everything with source=Bing on it? Am I
forced to have this source tag there? Should stuff, taken from Bing,
be verified via GPS
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors term,
How are they connected? please explain.
thanks,
mike
___
legal-talk mailing list
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors term,
as I have explicitly accepted them (version 1.0), and every mapper who
registered after March 2010 (correct?) are also contributing under CT 1.0?
I also did so and I *want* my contributions to get
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 11:49, Mike Dupont a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors
term,
How are they connected? please explain.
Because of the terms of the CT, I
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com wrote:
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 11:49, Mike Dupont a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors
21 matches
Mail list logo
