Am 13.05.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Tom Lee:
..
Nope. I was referring to collective databases in the ODbL which are
roughly the equivalent of collective works in early versions of CC
licenses and only require the OSM derived part to be subject to the ODbL
terms.
This is the
Apologies for the delay in my response.
Any sucess/feedback?
Not from their general inquiry address; I've put another line in via a
shared contact.
I've been meaning to ask if you could clarify a bit further, and/or correct
my understanding of the situation.
You wrote:
The actual
Am 06.05.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Tom Lee:
...
I think the vast quantity of CC-BY licenses data is too important a
resource to ignore given the slightness of this limitation, but I
understand the need for conservatism. One of Creative Commons' US
affiliates is located at a law school here in
Am 05.05.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Andrew Harvey:
...
My question was does CC-BY 4.0 have the same issue? Could CC-BY 4.0
data be included in OSM.
...
My, very conservative, reading of CC-BY 4.0 would indicate that it has
additional issues over just the attribution problem for databases.
CC-BY
Just as a clarification, versions of CC-by prior to 4.0 do not have this
issue, however do not address the issue of database rights at all.
All of the CC-BY licences -do- have the further issue, just as the ODbL,
that they do not allow sub-licensing (which I consider a defect),
however that
Simon Poole simon@... writes:
CC-BY 4.0 contains the following (4.b):
if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in
a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the
database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its
individual
My, very conservative, reading of CC-BY 4.0 would indicate that it has
additional issues over just the attribution problem for databases.
CC-BY 4.0 contains the following (4.b):
if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in
a database in which You have Sui Generis
Am 06.05.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Tom Lee:
..
I think things are getting a little mixed up. The ODbL refers to
Derivative Databases and Produced Works but not Derivative Works
(well, except one, but I think that line exists because of poor
drafting, not a deliberate choice).
I *think* you
Just found http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GettingPermission
it has hints about what extra permissions we require.
On 5 May 2015 at 19:27, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm bringing up a conversation from talk-au pertaining to what
additional permissions we need from
I'm bringing up a conversation from talk-au pertaining to what
additional permissions we need from content owners in order to include
or use as a source to derive further information from their CC-BY
licensed data in OSM.
Any advice is very much appreciated.
On 16 April 2015 at 15:26, Paul
10 matches
Mail list logo
