On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Again and again we hear, make it easier for people to geocode their
proprietary databases and OSM can only benefit from it because everyone
who saves $$ using OSM somehow magically helps OSM. I'm not convinced
of that.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Please review: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/
Geocoding_-_Guideline
Alex, you mention it was based on what you've gotten from lawyers. Is
there anything that can be shared, either publicly, or with
Am 28/lug/2014 um 09:07 schrieb Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com:
Our lawyers' advice is captured in the guideline as shared and posted in this
revision:
your lawyers did really say according to their understanding a pair of
coordinates is similar to an image or a video, hence a work?
The
Hello,
2014-07-28 7:19 GMT+02:00 Eric Gundersen e...@mapbox.com:
Accuracy is what matters, not skimping on a few $. We have dozens of large
companies like this that would love to more tightly integrate their
internal data with OSM via goecoding, but because of unclear guidelines are
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Eric Gundersen e...@mapbox.com wrote:
Let's not kid ourselves here. The overwhelming number of commercial OSM
users are not driven by a motivation to help us, but by a motivation to
save money (or perhaps a motivation to escape a monopolist's clutch but
that
Hi,
On 07/28/2014 12:07 PM, Tadeusz Knapik wrote:
What I'm not clear is if community
guidelines are strong enough to able to change it without touching the
license itself
There's a couple sides to this.
OSMF is limited to distributing the data under ODbL or CC-By-SA as per
the contributor
On 7/28/2014 6:31 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/28/2014 12:07 PM, Tadeusz Knapik wrote:
What I'm not clear is if community
guidelines are strong enough to able to change it without touching the
license itself
There's a couple sides to this.
OSMF is limited to distributing the data under
I would like to add my voice to this discussion. I strongly believe that within
the intended spirit of the OSM license, geocoding as defined in this proposal
should _not_ trigger share alike. I also believe that the legal interpretation
proposed has merit, but if legal advice suggests another
I would like to add my voice to this discussion. I strongly believe that
within the intended spirit of the OSM license, geocoding as defined in this
proposal should _not_ trigger share alike. I also believe that the legal
interpretation proposed has merit, but if legal advice suggests another
