Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Importing from an application's user generated content

2016-02-05 Thread Michael Ledford
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Simon Poole wrote: > > Frederik has already touched on most of the points, however > > - in the business model you outlined it is your data and it is your > responsibility to be able to identify the individual sources of > contributions, the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Importing from an application's user generated content

2016-02-03 Thread Michael Ledford
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Share-alike means that you have to make your derived database available > under ODbL on request. If you regularly make sure your database contents > go into OSM then you could potentially say, if such a request occurs, >

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Importing from an application's user generated content

2016-02-03 Thread Simon Poole
Am 04.02.2016 um 04:07 schrieb Michael Ledford: > ... >> Worst case, if the data you upload contains copyrighted material and we >> cannot easily enough identify which of your data is tainted and which is >> ok, then *all* data you uploaded might have to be removed again. > And this is why I am

[OSM-legal-talk] Importing from an application's user generated content

2016-01-28 Thread Michael Ledford
I'm interested in OSM POI data for use in an application. I want to use it in the following manner. The user of the application will be able to search for POIs and use them if present. If not present or incorrect I would like to take that data, under the license agreement of the application where

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Importing from an application's user generated content

2016-01-28 Thread Frederik Ramm
Michael, On 01/28/2016 07:42 PM, Michael Ledford wrote: > I believe that > updating the OSM database upholds share-alike. Share-alike means that you have to make your derived database available under ODbL on request. If you regularly make sure your database contents go into OSM then you could