Re: [OSM-legal-talk] question about collective databases
Am Mo, 27.02.2017, 11:14 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > > I am not sure about the relevance of your question here. You're right, this isn't an ODbL mailing list. I'm sorry. ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] question about collective databases
On Monday 27 February 2017, Tobias Wendorff wrote: > > http://opendata.blattspinat.com/ > -> Zuordnung von Landkreisen zu Postleitzahlen > (translation: "assignment of rural district to postal codes") > > The user released the final dataset under ODbL and gave this > attribution: > "ODbL © 2017 OpenStreetMap Contributers & © GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2015 > (Daten verändert)" (last two words mean: "data has been changed"). > > Let's say, he didn't make any analysis to the OSM data to fix missing > data, which would result in "Horizontal Layers" case. Is the result > a simple collective database? I am not sure about the relevance of your question here. The data set you refer to is licensed under ODbL which is permissible for OSM data both in a collective database and a derivative database (or a produced work for that matter). -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
[OSM-legal-talk] question about collective databases
Hi there. First of all, I don't want to denounce the user for his work. I'm just curious and interested, whether this kind of licensing is possible. The user is informed about my intent to post the question in here. On this website, an OSM user has joined OpenStreetMap-data under ODbL with a dataset from the Federal Government for Geo-Information and Geodesy of Germany. This data is released under "GeoNutzV", which allows the content to be used by everyone for everything, but wants a "BY" attribution on each product including a special note, if the data has been edited. Furthermore, the author can revoke the need for attribution. It's also clearly allowed to mix the data with other datasets. http://opendata.blattspinat.com/ -> Zuordnung von Landkreisen zu Postleitzahlen (translation: "assignment of rural district to postal codes") The user released the final dataset under ODbL and gave this attribution: "ODbL © 2017 OpenStreetMap Contributers & © GeoBasis-DE / BKG 2015 (Daten verändert)" (last two words mean: "data has been changed"). Let's say, he didn't make any analysis to the OSM data to fix missing data, which would result in "Horizontal Layers" case. Is the result a simple collective database? Best regards, Tobias ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk