Hallo Hello,
we would like to inform you that we have added the following essay at
Wir mchten Euch - insbesondere die, die mit Friendsarbeit beschftigt sind,
informieren, da wir den nachfolgenden Artikel auf die Seite aufgenommen haben:
Link: http://www.communards.de (under
In a recent post I mentioned the disagreement over the European military
force. Here are a few links from the BBC website:
December 10, 1999
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_557000/557700.stm
May 24, 2000
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_761000/761467.stm
Notes from Louise Bryant "Six Red Months in Russia" [written 1917].
[Bryant was the political co-worker and lover of John Reed. In this little memoir
she gives her thumbnail impressions about Lenin, the Bolsheviks and the early days
of Soviet Power.]
The workingmen demand, above all, frankness
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:18:31 +,
Owen Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the members of their [KPRF] Central Committee advocated the
extermination of
the Russian Jewish population.
Who? Where? When?
Alexander Domrin
___
Leninist-International
V. I . Lenin
Lenin on the National Question
THE SOCIALIST REVOLUTION AND THE RIGHT OF NATIONS
TO SELF-DETERMINATION (THESES)
1. IMPERIALISM, SOCIALISM AND THE LIBERATION OF OPPRESSED NATIONS
Imperialism is the highest stage of development of capitalism. Capital
in the
I do not know whether General Makashov was a CPRF CC member, but he was
elected on the CPRF slate to the Duma. Unfortunately it will be rather easy
to find more antisemitic quotes from leading CPRF members.
Johannes
Just as you will find antisemitic quotes from leaders of the German
Communist
1.
I do not know whether General Makashov was a CPRF CC member, but he was
elected on the CPRF slate to the Duma.
Makashov was NEVER on the KPRF Party List.
In 1999 he was on the party list of "Movement in Support of Army"
(Ilyukhin, Makashov, Savelyev) which got 0.58 percent of votes and
Subj: pt 2 - The RKRP, Pseudo-Communists and Antisemites
Date: 12/01/01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PART TWO
The RKRP after Anpilov
In the explanation of Anpilov's departure given on the party's official
website, there is not a word about racism. Instead, his expulsion in 1996 is
described
Considering the sectarian nature of the matter, I tend to agree. Steve, your address
is [EMAIL PROTECTED], so people who are burning to get your analysis will get it there.
Too many people are choked at your analysis. Personally, I am not pleased with
calling the Zyuganov bunch "linked with the
Final Edition
2001-01-10
How the Internet sustained a strike
By Paul Andrews
Seattle Union Record
A digital Joe Hill helped carry the torch for the Seattle newspaper strike.
Economies of scale. Low barriers to entry. Reduced distribution costs. Creation of
community.
The Internet was the
My previous post expressed deep admiration of Owen's concise post on the
KPRF. Now let us stare at some of the timer-servers who responded and could
not understand the genuine Marxist kernel within this important post.
Steve
XXx
In a message dated 15/01/01 23:12:20 GMT
Owen presents a balanced analysis. Jones and Proyect start arguing that the
list should be wound up, Is Owen somehow threatening civilisation as we know
it? What left list-politics is really behind all this going on? Can someone
explain?
Steve Myers.
Sure. This list has been dominated by
Carrol Cox wrote:
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky wrote:
If this is the scenario, then many may be thinking
of a new age of "own spheres of influence" such as during the 30s.
In a different context, this would have meant a war in a not so far
future.
What do we think of the possibilities
Sometimes (although it is very rare) listmembers make the job much easier. The job
being to determine how to deal with a situation delicately that is becoming more and
more hostile. Then someone is kind enough to say the following.
Owen presents a balanced analysis. Jones and Proyect start
Lenin 'will flay an opponent in debate and walk out of the hall
arm-in-arm with him.[...]'
***
The purpose of L-I summed up 84 years ago.
Macdonald
---
Macdonald Stainsby
Rad-Green List: Radical anti-capitalist environmental discussion.
Remember, some of us are not arm chair revolutionaries. We are very busy.
If the posts are not serious and relevant and I don't have time to read them.
At least one friend has already gotten off the list because of time wasting
flaming. I just got off the Black Left list because some men
At 12:59 PM 1/16/01 -0800, you wrote:
Lenin 'will flay an opponent in debate and walk out of the hall
arm-in-arm with him.[...]'
***
The purpose of L-I summed up 84 years ago.
Macdonald
I want to expand upon this a little. In a very real sense, these mailing
lists are a microcosm of the
The October Rising: a feeble putsch by a few intellectuals?
"... my relations with Vladimir Ilyich had been most cordial. But at
that moment... I saw the full extent of [his] responsibility for the
fate of the country and the revolution... "
"... an armed insurrection means arming wide
This message will be of interest to anyone going to Washington Jan. 20 to
join the protests at the inauguration parade. Because the police and Secret
Service have decided that everyone much go through a checkpoint gate to
enter the area and that they will decide who can and can't enter, a lawsuit
Well I do 'fret'. I am not sure what is supposed to be accomplished
by removing Vladimir Bilenkin, Steve Myers, and Owen Jones from the
list? And I say this from having been admonished myself in the
past, for the level of rhetoric I have engaged in with 2 of these
individuals.
True.
At 06:33 PM 1/16/01 -0600, you wrote:
Well I do 'fret'. I am not sure what is supposed to be accomplished
by removing Vladimir Bilenkin, Steve Myers, and Owen Jones from the
list? And I say this from having been admonished myself in the
past, for the level of rhetoric I have engaged in
I am curious as to whether anyone has a citation for when Lenin said that "What is to
be done?" had become irrelevant. I tend to believe it has some benefits we can learn
from (as in which questions to ask), but am skeptical of the relevance it has for
actions we might take in 2001.
(State and
Mac wrote:
I am curious as to whether anyone has a citation for when Lenin said that
"What is to
be done?" had become irrelevant. I tend to believe it has some benefits we
can learn
from (as in which questions to ask), but am skeptical of the relevance it
has for
actions we might take in 2001.
- Original Message -
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is not about censoring a point of view. It is about trying to move
away from dead end factionalism. There were problems with James (Red Rebel)
Tait, the DHKC, and A. Wosni as well. I can't even
This will be my last post to L-I both as moderator and as a subscriber.
Since there are still some comrades on this list I respect, they owe an
explanation. Here are the reason, why do not want to be associated with this
list in any way any longer:
1. The acceptance of the defence of
I am also a member of Solidarity, and contribute commentary on that list
sponsored by that organization, where Owen and Steve's views on
Milosevic and Kagarlitsky reign supreme. It does not make my case
easier to argue against these views there, when a level of intolerance
for debate
1. The acceptance of the defence of anti-semitism ('not the real question')
or anti-semitism itself ( criticising Yeltsin for beeing a Jew ) from the
side of moderators. This is simply too disgusting that I do not want to go
into further details.
It is not a *criticism* of Yeltsin to say
Al-Ahram Weekly On-line
11 - 17 January 2001
Issue No.516
http://www.ahram.org.eg/weekly/2001/516/fr1.htm
No, yes, but...
Most Palestinians have said "No" to US proposals. But has their leader?
Graham Usher writes from Jerusalem
--
Mine Aysen Doyran
Ph.D Student
Department of Political
28 matches
Mail list logo
