I'm very much astonished to read such thing from you, comrade Mine. Owen may be
wrong or not on the question of stateownership in Croatia/Serbia, but at least
he is no defeatist running after one or another bourgeois regime because he
can't think about real power of the workers. This is the
Christian Science Monitor, June 6, 1996
On the one hand, Mr. Milosevic is desperate for international recognition
of his regime, and to use his status as a peacemaker - bestowed by the West
when he forced Bosnian Serbs to negotiate last autumn and signed the Dayton
peace accord on their behalf
Croatia under Tudjman had a much higher level of state ownership than
Serbia under Milosevic, according to an economist Louis quoted from PEN-L or
whatever the list is called in a rather vain effort to prove the progressive
credentials of the Milosevic regime.
Owen, this is not true! In
Reply to Mine Aysen Doyran, at [EMAIL PROTECTED], who wrote on the
22/11/2000 21:34:
In my humble opinion, you should subscribe Pen-l. I am sure you will find a
large audience to your views there.
Typical of the Milosevic fan club crowd. Those who do not subscribe to
their twisted apologia
Now now, lad...you seem to be the one who keeps re-joining lists you
denounce as
cesspools of revisionism and/or get kicked off of, are you not?
but I love ya anyway...
Macdonald
Actually, John Lacny's list, which was supposed to be a Milosevic-free
environment, is one of the most boring
En relación a [L-I] Re: Serbia a "typical postcommunist state",
el 22 Nov 00, a las 22:06, Owen Jones dijo:
Reply to Mine Aysen Doyran, at [EMAIL PROTECTED], who wrote on the
22/11/2000 21:34:
In my humble opinion, you should subscribe Pen-l. I am sure you will find a
larg
En relación a Re: [L-I] Re: Serbia a "typical postcommunist sta,
el 22 Nov 00, a las 17:25, Louis Proyect dijo:
Now now, lad...you seem to be the one who keeps re-joining lists you
denounce as
cesspools of revisionism and/or get kicked off of, are you not?
but I love ya anyway...
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky wrote:
Mine's proposition, from what I
could learn of PEN-L during my permanence there, is a very sound one indeed. Many
people there would honestly agree with you. Mischievousness on her side, at most,
lies in what she did _not_ tell you on some other people who
Hi Mac
This is awful stuff.
The author of this piece is assuming two falsities: 1, that the "revolution"
in
Yugoslavia must have been a popular one,
Frankly if that revolution was not "popular" to use your vocabulary, then I
really am at a lost as to what is a "popular" revolution by
Owen:
I'm sure the money was very useful for banners and posters and buying
mansions for opposition leaders but it doesn't really explain why hundreds
of thousands of workers and peasants took to the streets of the country and
seized control of the means of production. How did imperialist money
10 matches
Mail list logo
