> Your comments, please.
It'll be a day or two before I have time to take another run at
understanding setup.py, or (perhaps) have anything meaningful to contribute.
-matt
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this
> Can somebody *please* explain to me why the first way is far superior to
> the second. I just do not get it.
`pip install leo` downloads ~5-6mb, vs git clone's ~130mb (and always
growing).
This won't matter for many, but for those whom conserving bandwidth and/or
space is important it's a big
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 04:53:43 -0800 (PST)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> Davy Cottet has offered to create a Debian distro for Leo shortly
> after Leo 5.0-final goes out the door. That's great, and I
> appreciate the effort.
>
> When a leo distro exists, people will be able to do:
>
> (sudo) apt
>
> I don't understand your point here. You are welcome to become part of
> the leo-editor team.
>
>
I just wanted to say that it would be better if leo ppa could be part of
leo-editor existing launchpad account for you to have full control of it.
I just set-up a PPA to see what are differ
Edward K. Ream wrote:
Davy Cottet has offered to create a Debian distro for Leo shortly
after Leo 5.0-final goes out the door. That's great, and I appreciate
the effort.
I'm assuming you mean Debian package, not distro.
When a leo distro exists, people will be able to do:
(sudo) apt-g
Davy Cottet has offered to create a Debian distro for Leo shortly after Leo
5.0-final goes out the door. That's great, and I appreciate the effort.
When a leo distro exists, people will be able to do:
(sudo) apt-get install leo
But even without an official leo package, people can just do:
Imo, setup.py is not a release blocker for Leo 5.0 final. However, because
of ongoing controversy, I plan to release Leo 5.0-rc1 later today, after
fixing one more bug. This release will be for final testing only: it will
only be announced here.
Here is what I think I know about the present s
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Davy Cottet wrote:
> I've less time to work on it on the week-end, but I think within a couple
> of days, I'll get to the point of having a clean debian build procedure for
> Leo.
>
Excellent. This should avoid most issues with python setup.py install on
Linux.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> I am willing to delay 5.0 final as long as necessary to get setup.py
> working with both distutils (python setup.py install) and pip (pip install).
>
It seems to me that setup.py *does* work on both Windows and Ubuntu with
distutils, wh
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Largo84 wrote:
> Leo 5.0b2, build 20141121084819, Fri Nov 21 08:48:19 CST 2014
> Git repo info: branch = master, commit = 8618fe9d83c5
> Python 3.3.3, PyQt version 5.2.0
> Windows 8 AMD64 (build 6.2.9200)
>
> When editing at the end of a large block of text where
A good example of multi-os install script with quite the same dependencies
as Leo is the one from Eric IDE :
http://die-offenbachs.homelinux.org:4/hg/eric/file/8e2b5bdd6bf3/install.py
However, for both Calibre and Eric IDE one important point is that they are
installed as "stand-alone" appl
11 matches
Mail list logo
