Re: Struggling to get Leo!!!

2015-10-27 Thread Frustrated!
Edward, thank you for your response. I wasn't expecting a reply from someone so high up! :-) Having followed your links, I now have Leo installed, and also PyQt (which *did *finish installing, but I actually don't see a PyQt directory anywhere, although there are plenty of filenames

Re: Struggling to get Leo!!!

2015-10-27 Thread Frustrated!
p.s. After posting the reply below, I managed to get workbook.leo open, by double-clicking launchLeo.py I presume this is Leo in action. I'll investigate further... On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 21:44:48 UTC+13, Frustrated! wrote: > > Edward, thank you for your response. I wasn't expecting a

Re: My last lecture. Part 1: Why Leo is noteworthy

2015-10-27 Thread john lunzer
This is a good summary of Leo's history and capabilities. Because this thread has been met with some... criticism I will provide my reaction and some guidance for further posting. Firstly, this is likely not the thread for criticism of Leo's design decisions. Edward and friends are capable

Re: My last lecture. Part 1: Why Leo is noteworthy

2015-10-27 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Jacob Peck wrote: > On 10/27/2015 11:34 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > Imo, nobody could grok these advantages by reading documentation or > reviews. I just had to immerse myself in the new language. Probably the > same is true about Leo

Re: My last lecture. Part 1: Why Leo is noteworthy

2015-10-27 Thread Jacob Peck
On 10/27/2015 11:34 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: Imo, nobody could grok these advantages by reading documentation or reviews. I just had to immerse myself in the new language. Probably the same is true about Leo programming. I just have to say that this is perhaps the single most salient line in

Re: My last lecture. Part 1: Why Leo is noteworthy

2015-10-27 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:59 AM, john lunzer wrote: > This is a good summary of Leo's history and capabilities. Because this > thread has been met with some... criticism I will provide my reaction and > some guidance for further posting. > ​Thanks for your comments. ​ They

Re: Struggling to get Leo!!!

2015-10-27 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Frustrated! wrote: > But when I try to open Leo by double-clicking on its icon, and putting my > 3 initials into the "Enter Leo id" dialogue which says leoID.txt not found, > nothing happens. > ​Leo attempts to create leoID.txt in one of

Re: My last lecture. Part 1: Why Leo is noteworthy

2015-10-27 Thread Chris George
Synchronicity is funny. I had just read about this in one of my course readings. *Shu (obey)*. In this beginning stage, the student follows the teachings of one master precisely. He concentrates on how to do the task, without worrying too much about the underlying theory. If there are multiple

Added "Show Parents" option to quicksearch

2015-10-27 Thread john lunzer
This adds a further level of indentation to the quicksearch results and groups all results by their parent node. Matches in nodes at level 0 are grouped in a custom "Root" parent. "n hits" now accurately represents the number of occurrences in both headlines and bodies throughout the body.

Re: Added "Show Parents" option to quicksearch

2015-10-27 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:17:04 -0700 (PDT) john lunzer wrote: > This adds a further level of indentation to the quicksearch results > and groups all results by their parent node. nice - I was already finding the node level grouping useful. I added some code so Ctrl-click

Re: Added "Show Parents" option to quicksearch

2015-10-27 Thread john lunzer
Thanks for that Terry, I was going to implement something similar and may still for the delete key. My method for implementing these uses event handlers and I can make the event handler specific to a specific widget, so in this case a list widget specific event handler. But the day was getting

Re: Added "Show Parents" option to quicksearch

2015-10-27 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:45:13 -0700 (PDT) john lunzer wrote: > Thanks for that Terry, I was going to implement something similar and > may still for the delete key. Good idea. You can refactor the code to reuse my snippet - no need for two of us to find out that hiding the