About installation docs

Installation docs are, by far, the most important and most difficult documentation for any program, including Leo. The difficulties are legion: 1. Newcomers don't have Leonine vocabulary at their finger tips. All they want to do is install Leo so they can see what it can do. 2. Procedural

Installation docs coming soon

After considerable thought, I am going to adopt Lewis Neal's suggested installation docs myself. I'll add them to LeoDocs.leo and update Leo's web site accordingly. This should happen later today. We can then discuss them

Re: When using LeoBridge, leoG.IdleTime() always returns None

On Monday, January 29, 2018 at 3:57:00 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: There is no way to build something like this into Leo's bridge, because the > concept of idle time simply does not exist. That is, individual leoBridge > scripts must find their own ways of calling code periodically.​ >

Re: New plugin line_numbering

Hi: Thanks for the quick, and confirmed, fix. Line numbers are now correctly assigned, thank you. Re @clean vs. @nosent, the thing I like about @nosent is that Leo does not re-read the exported file -- thus there's only one "true source" of the file, which suits my workflow well. I realize

Re: New plugin line_numbering

Try `@clean` instead of `@nosent`, they have the same function but @nosent is considered a bit archaic. Fixed at ccf76ca26c268a0ff On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 10:49:43 PM UTC+1, John Hutchinson wrote: > > Hi: > > I'm running the latest Leo from Git. I just enabled this plugin. With >

Re: When using LeoBridge, leoG.IdleTime() always returns None

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Segundo Bob wrote: > > I will probably try monkey patching g.IdleTime before calling LeoBridge. > That is, I will try implementing an idle time manager for LeoBridge > with the same interface as the Leo-Editor idle time manager. > ​That

Re: Matt, what's the status of #562?

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Matt Wilkie wrote: > 8b6f281 > > puts > the Pypi build and upload notes into nodes. > ​Many thanks for this. Rev 15035f2 contains the following minor

Re: Matt, what's the status of #562?

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:26 PM, Matt Wilkie wrote: > Thanks for picking this up and pointing out the bits that aren't clear. > > > Is it really true, as you imply, that pyqt gets installed automatically > with python 3? Or have I misunderstood something? > > Yes that's