I think you are looking at the wrong level. You are writing in terms of
implementation, but what is ti about vim that you expect to do in Leo, and
why do think Leo has something to offer an experienced vim user? Note that
I'm writing as a non-vim user, so my ideas about its usefulness are
I dont see any other opportunities but to re-design Leo, leave all the
features but change all the mechanics.
Let me give an example. Let it be the problem of code navigation.
Far away from the start of the epoch editors did it themselves: parsers,
regexps, strange approaches.
I keep remember
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 5:04 AM gar wrote:
> Well, there's a trouble with it. You have 2 separate windows which are in
> sync, but you have to remember about it all the time.
> And none of your hotkeys work until you press alt-tab.
> This is not the route I'd love to use on everyday basis.
>
No,
It's been a long time since I declared a quiet time for myself. It seems
like a good thing to do right now.
During quiet time I'll defer responses to discussions here. The purpose of
quiet time is to rid myself of day-to-day distractions, and instead focus
on questions.
Text editors like vim
Well, there's a trouble with it. You have 2 separate windows which are in
sync, but you have to remember about it all the time.
And none of your hotkeys work until you press alt-tab.
This is not the route I'd love to use on everyday basis.
There is another potential way forward. At present, Leo's
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:21 AM vitalije wrote:
Is it that the existing code recreates all the QT items from scratch every
> time there is a redraw? And your code can add/remove a much smaller subset
> of QT items because of your set operations?
>
Yes, that's the difference.
> I didn't quite
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 9:05:25 PM UTC-5, btheado wrote:
>
>
>
> This looks interesting. Thanks for sharing. I'm not familiar with how the
> existing tree drawing approach works. Could you share (in broad strokes)
> what the current drawing does and how it is different from your new
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 3:50 AM gar wrote:
> First, I apologies for being too emotional. I do really love vim and do
> really love leo so the news that they would never be together made me too
> upset.
> Secondly, after thinking about the bridge more and more I would probably
> accept your point
First, I apologies for being too emotional. I do really love vim and do
really love leo so the news that they would never be together made me too
upset.
Secondly, after thinking about the bridge more and more I would probably
accept your point of view.
Making the bridge itself has no practical
>
> Is it that the existing code recreates all the QT items from scratch every
> time there is a redraw? And your code can add/remove a much smaller subset
> of QT items because of your set operations?
>
>
Yes, that's the difference.
> I didn't quite follow your example about expanding a
10 matches
Mail list logo
