Re: VR3 can now be opened in a tab

Here is an alternative way to delete a tab, where you type the tab name into the minibuffer. The code can go into an @command or @button node: """Delete named tab from log frame. Get tab name to delete from minbuffer.""" def delete_tab(): """State 0""" k = c.k

PR #3277 has been merged into devel

PR #3277 changes g.os_path_finalize and g.os_path_finalize_join, and rev 32c9f adds a missing alias. These changes are non-trivial. Please report

Re: Last call for reviews of PR #3277: improved path functions

Sorry - I didnt have the time yet: I'll review those changes tonight :) Félix On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 8:23:28 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 7:21 AM Thomas Passin wrote: > >> Some of my outlines have an @rst tree like this: >> >> - @path ... >> - @rst .

Re: Last call for reviews of PR #3277: improved path functions

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 7:21 AM Thomas Passin wrote: > Some of my outlines have an @rst tree like this: > > - @path ... > - @rst . > - [the rest of the tree ...] > > I wanted to make sure the the @path directive would be honored when the > rst3 command and then Sphinx were run.

Re: Last call for reviews of PR #3277: improved path functions

Some of my outlines have an @rst tree like this: - @path ... - @rst . - [the rest of the tree ...] I wanted to make sure the the @path directive would be honored when the rst3 command and then Sphinx were run. I just checked this for one outline and it worked as intended. So

Re: Last call for reviews of PR #3277: improved path functions

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 7:08 AM Thomas Passin wrote: > I haven't been having any problems. All my external files I've been > working with open and save correctly. I've been holding off saying > anything until I have some more experience with the new code, but so far so > good. > > I have not

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

And there's this slashdot report - https://slashdot.org/story/23/04/14/2152250/overemployed-hustlers-exploit-chatgpt-to-take-on-even-more-full-time-jobs?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon_medium=feed People are using ChatGPT to be able to take on additional side hustles. it does much of the extra

Re: Last call for reviews of PR #3277: improved path functions

I haven't been having any problems. All my external files I've been working with open and save correctly. I've been holding off saying anything until I have some more experience with the new code, but so far so good. I have not tried constructing any new external path expressions as yet. On

Re: Last call for reviews of PR #3277: improved path functions

On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 6:46:39 AM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: PR #3277 proposes significant changes to Leo's path-related code. I have asked Félix and Thomas for reviews, without recent results. Perhaps they are reluctant to comment,

Last call for reviews of PR #3277: improved path functions

PR #3277 proposes significant changes to Leo's path-related code. I have asked Félix and Thomas for reviews, without recent results. Perhaps they are reluctant to comment, which is understandable given the scope of the changes. I'll take

Impressive ChatGPT responses

ChatGPT generates impressive answers for the following queries: "Disprove the assertion that the earth is flat." "Prove that the earth is flat." Imo, the responses to these queries are more compelling than any I have seen. Other example queries : "Disprove the theory of intelligent design."

Re: Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4

On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 6:09:09 AM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: This breathless two-minute paper references an arXiv preprint from Microsoft Research I dismissed Dr. Károly Zsolnai-Fehér's YouTube video

Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4

This breathless two-minute paper references an arXiv preprint from Microsoft Research: Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. I highly recommend reading this paper. The

Re: Leo 6.7.3 coming soon

On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 12:24:03 PM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: Leo has 100% coverage of most of its core code. Full coverage doesn't guarantee correctness, but it's good enough. Otoh, pydantic and hypothesis are worth investigating. See #3280