On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Satish Goda wrote:
> Hi Edward.
>
> I meant this -> http://leoeditor.com/leoBridge.html
>
> I have not had time to try this inside pyzo, but testing leoBridge within
> pyzo would be a good test.
>
I ran the following script within pyzo without problems:
import
Hi Edward.
I meant this -> http://leoeditor.com/leoBridge.html
I have not had time to try this inside pyzo, but testing leoBridge within
pyzo would be a good test.
On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 7:32:58 PM UTC+8, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Satish Goda > wr
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Satish Goda wrote:
> I think in today's world of disparate software components, It would be
> really nice to see how Leo's integration component would integrate with
> Pyzo.
>
What do mean by "Leo's integration component"?
> I really wish for a future where p
I think in today's world of disparate software components, It would be
really nice to see how Leo's integration component would integrate with
Pyzo.
I really wish for a future where plug and play of awesome components from
various disciplines will be as easy and painless as possible.
On Saturd
I've been thinking of this ever since Satish Goda's original PlantUML and
pyzo posts.
Yes, it would theoretically be possible to embed Leo into pyzo, but the
sane, sensible (and polite) approach is to leave pyzo alone, and make Leo
do everything that pyzo can do ;-)
Otoh, for study only, it ma
