Re: Merging of read-at-foo-nodes

2008-09-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently, there are many commands to read in current node: read-at-auto-nodes read-at-file-nodes read-at-shadow-nodes Why not have one command to combine all of these, which would select the right command based on

Re: Merging of read-at-foo-nodes

2008-09-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it's waiting on nested @path working... where's that at Edward? It appears to work on the at-path branch. Edward --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Merging of read-at-foo-nodes

2008-09-06 Thread Lew Maestas
Perhaps a simple FSM (Finite State Machine) could work here too? The node_type_state could = @shadow, @file, @node, et al. The code specific for each type of node could then be triggered? If there are any node specific commands, they could be isolated and perhaps the @command list could be

Merging of read-at-foo-nodes

2008-09-05 Thread Ville M. Vainio
Currently, there are many commands to read in current node: read-at-auto-nodes read-at-file-nodes read-at-shadow-nodes Why not have one command to combine all of these, which would select the right command based on the headline of the current node (@shadow, @auto...) More importantly, this

Re: Merging of read-at-foo-nodes

2008-09-05 Thread Ville M. Vainio
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not have one command to combine all of these, which would select the right command based on the headline of the current node (@shadow, @auto...) More importantly, this command should be available as keyboard

Re: Merging of read-at-foo-nodes

2008-09-05 Thread Terry Brown
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:55:06 -0500 Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a directory browsing plugin p.s. the parallel hadn't occured to me before, the the plug-ins basically @shadow-dir :-) Cheers -Terry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message