Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:19 PM, john lunzer wrote: > I agree with you that change Alt-end to goto-last-sibling makes more sense > and that Alt-RtArrow is better left to personalized settings. > ​Thanks for your comments. I've just changed my bindings for goto-last-sibling to

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Richard Andersen wrote: > I think that Alt+RightArrow going to the last sibling would be quite > useful. I have a node called Contacts and I add each new Contact record > as a child sibling. > ​The more I think about this, the more it

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

I agree with you that change Alt-end to goto-last-sibling makes more sense and that Alt-RtArrow is better left to personalized settings. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 4:17:01 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Richard Andersen > wrote: >

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

I see your point. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:00 AM, john lunzer > wrote: > >> I do not disagree with you that it has the feel of an easter egg. But by >> that logic the left arrow is an easter

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Richard Andersen wrote: > I think that Alt+RightArrow going to the last sibling would be quite > useful. I have a node called Contacts and I add each new Contact record > as a child sibling. Would be great to go there with a quick

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:00 AM, john lunzer wrote: > I do not disagree with you that it has the feel of an easter egg. But by > that logic the left arrow is an easter egg as well for jumping to the > parent node when there is nothing to contract. You could call it a >

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

I think that Alt+RightArrow going to the last sibling would be quite useful. I have a node called Contacts and I add each new Contact record as a child sibling. Would be great to go there with a quick command from the above level node. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 9:00:33 AM UTC-7,

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

I do not disagree with you that it has the feel of an easter egg. But by that logic the left arrow is an easter egg as well for jumping to the parent node when there is nothing to contract. You could call it a contextual binding. Its easter eggyness should not prevent it from existing. I

Re: Suggestion: Expand right arrow behavior in outline to perform goto-last-sibling if node has no children with siblings

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:18 AM, john lunzer wrote: > Right now the right arrow both expands the current node if contracted and > if already expanded will goto the first sibling. My proposition is to also > add the behavior to goto-last-sibling if the node has no children and