On Nov 30, 11:49 am, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:18:02 -0800 (PST)
HansBKK hans...@gmail.com wrote:
Please let me know if there's a way to accomplish this that I haven't
found - I don't like the fact that the backlinks' tags, bookmarks etc
are hidden
On Nov 29, 9:37 am, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
This suggests, perhaps strongly, that it might be good to repackage
2to3 as a Leonine refactoring tool. It's quite possible that 2to3 has
already solved problems that I do not yet know even exist.
This is being overly humble.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:53 PM, ilkosta
costantino.giuliod...@gmail.com wrote:
After
two successful clone I created a button, and I started to think that
Leo is not a tool for lazy people, even for lazy programmer , but a
great tool for programmer. Laziness is a virtue for me.
The whole
Hi,
On 11/01/11 05:04, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Kent Tenneykten...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
2. How do we understand complex computer programs?
The other topic I think would benefit Leo is improved persistence.
We shall more forward on this, but imo
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:31:33 -0800 (PST)
HansBKK hans...@gmail.com wrote:
My goal is to *not* make use of structures that are specific to Leo,
so if fifteen years from now I'm not using Leo anymore, the next
50,000 chunks of text I've captured/written won't need a programmer to
continue being
On Wed Nov 9 10:55:15 2011, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
The moment you want to create is the moment that you
need to deal with details of creation and is also the moment you will need
to deal with documentation, that's why the idea of
On 11/08/11 11:33, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, mdbmdbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comments please.
I vote for using rst2pdf
Thanks for your vote. I'm leaning the same way. I think using
standard tools wherever possible is a big improvements over hacks like
On Nov 29, 3:46 pm, Matt Wilkie map...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:26 AM, ne1uno eltro...@gmail.com wrote:
get regmon filemon if they are still available from sysinternals
[]
regmon and filemon have been superceded by procmon (Process
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:35:07 PM UTC+7, Terry wrote:
so if fifteen years from now I'm not using Leo anymore, the next 50,000
chunks of text I've captured/written won't need a programmer to continue
being accessible, relatively easy to transform into whatever I'll be using
next.
