I have used html templates before in the context of CMS systems which
already had the templating engines in place and would automatically replace
the templates with the substitutions. However, that's not really what I
need. I create html 'fragments' in Leo which are then copy/pasted into
other
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:49:19 -0800 (PST)
vitalije wrote:
> For HTML and CSS there are a lot of pre-processors for example: pug
> for HTML and sass for css. Both of them have more than one way to
> define some section once and use it anywhere you like it. Basically
> you write source files in pug
Hmm, unfamiliar with those tools, will check them out. Thanks!
On Saturday, March 9, 2019 at 1:49:19 PM UTC-5, vitalije wrote:
>
> For HTML and CSS there are a lot of pre-processors for example: pug for
> HTML and sass for css. Both of them have more than one way to define some
> section once
For HTML and CSS there are a lot of pre-processors for example: pug for
HTML and sass for css. Both of them have more than one way to define some
section once and use it anywhere you like it. Basically you write source
files in pug and sass format, and then compile those source files into the
Thanks for clarifying, Vitalije. Yes, I'm the only one who would edit them
and I don't use external editors, so clones would certainly be the easiest
way to do that. I use \include{file.tex} for LaTeX documents, but don't
know about a similar mechanism for html or css documents. Any of the
>
>
>- I could easily do that with cloned nodes. However, we are strongly
>encouraged *not* to create cross-file clones.
>
> Any suggestions on how to accomplish that without using clones?
>
>
As long as you are not using any other editor to edit those files and you
are the only
Suppose I have a xxx.leo file in which I write multiple web pages (or other
document types, same question).
- Each document is a separate @file (or @clean) external file.
- Inside each web page are sections (nodes with or without children)
that all need to be the same content (perhaps
