I think your idea is very reasonable, always thinking of the simplest
solution! ;)
On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 11:45:57 PM UTC-4, Terry Brown wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
> john lunzer wrote:
>
> > I don't think you're misinterpreting. It is a
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 4:42 AM, john lunzer wrote:
> I think your idea is very reasonable, always thinking of the simplest
> solution! ;)
>
Several years ago now, Ville introduced us to the concept of "the simplest
thing that could possibly work." Imo, it's the best
I don't think you're misinterpreting. It is a hierarchical listing. My
thought comes from my own use case where I'm working with many subclasses
which implement empty base class functions and when I get the results I
can't tell which hit is hit, if I was able to see the parent node then I
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
john lunzer wrote:
> I implemented a filter which removes duplicate headline matches and I
> added a 4-space indent to body matches which makes a huge difference
> visually especially when there are multiple body matches.
Great idea,
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
john lunzer wrote:
> I don't think you're misinterpreting. It is a hierarchical listing.
> My thought comes from my own use case where I'm working with many
> subclasses which implement empty base class functions and when I get
> the
I implemented a filter which removes duplicate headline matches and I added
a 4-space indent to body matches which makes a huge difference visually
especially when there are multiple body matches.
I plan* to add a "group by parent" check box which will identify the parent
of each match and