Re: The future of Leo

Hi, I like the direction this is taking. I would like to have Leo bringing "outlining services" to other programs, including Emacs, Org Mode, Atom, Jupyter, Vim and/or Pharo. I imagine some kind of minimal test that allows external programs to connect to the "Leo Server" and use it from the

Re: The future of Leo

On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 7:28 AM Terry Brown wrote: I'm not sure which parts of Leo you're talking about, but #1025 certainly > helps > on that front. Still not quite sure about the boundaries. > Boundaries are fluid, especially concerning Leo and org mode. I'll be writing about this in #1026.

Re: The future of Leo

On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:53:15 -0800 (PST) "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > We can make Leo more accessible by integrating Leo's essentials into > emacs, vim, pyzo or even atom. I was going to say that I don't understand this project because I'm not sure which parts of Leo you're talking about, but

The future of Leo

After Terry's recent announcement , it's a good time to consider Leo's future. See the summary. *Devs* Leo's devs remain a huge asset. Terry is still reading this group, and I will welcome his comments. Vitalije has proven

Re: My future with Leo

Edward: Also appreciate the glimpse. Also a bit of a younger perspective, as I'm barely in my twenties. Recent discussions convince me that Leo is in excellent hands with Terry > and Vitalije. This is reassuring. Leo is likely to thrive after I am gone. > It has also been upsetting. I am no

Re: My future with Leo

Edward I appreciate this glimpse into your bigger world. A switch of focus to living in the light has been on my mind too. It's all too easy to snipe and gripe from the sidelines -- there are so many broken things and foolish people! (I include myself in both sets) -- and thereby fritter away

Re: My future with Leo

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Terry Brown wrote: I'm not sure that you can be described as non-essential :-} > ​Thanks for the vote of confidence. Eventually I'll be gone, so let's hope I am not essential then ;-) ​ > Leo's very much on the large end of ~ one person projects (i.e. >

Re: My future with Leo

On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 03:59:25 -0700 (PDT) "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > Recent discussions convince me that Leo is in excellent hands with > Terry and Vitalije. This is reassuring. Leo is likely to thrive > after I am gone. It has also been upsetting. I am no longer an > essential part of my own

My future with Leo

Recent discussions convince me that Leo is in excellent hands with Terry and Vitalije. This is reassuring. Leo is likely to thrive after I am gone. It has also been upsetting. I am no longer an essential part of my own life's work. For the last week I have been taking stock of my life. Once

Is mylyn the future of Leo?

Somebody has finally explained the virtues of Leo, but he was explaining another product :-) http://tasktop.com/videos/w-jax/kersten-keynote.html See also: http://www.tasktop.com/videos/mylyn/webcast-mylyn-3.0.html Apparently, the ee (enterprise edition) of Eclipse comes with mylyn already

Re: Is mylyn the future of Leo?

On May 14, 11:14 am, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote: Somebody has finally explained the virtues of Leo, but he was explaining another product :-) While the explanation is correct, there doesn't seem to be any way of putting snippets of code into a task, which is the essential