Re: operating on groups of nodes...

2008-06-27 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But Move would be trickier of course, given the rules about not being your own ancestor. So I guess the polite way would be to attempt to move all the nodes selected to the target position, and if it fails, abort and do

Re: operating on groups of nodes...

2008-06-26 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To be as versatile a tool as possible it seems to me that Leo needs to be able to select and operate on groups of nodes. I've seen the groupOperations.py plugin, and it's ok, but I don't really think it addresses the

Re: operating on groups of nodes...

2008-06-26 Thread Terry Brown
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:37:32 -0500 Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The simplest thing that could possibly work is to mark nodes (possibly in a way distinct from standard marks) and then support commands to operate on such marked nodes. Say commands such as: clone-marked-nodes,

Re: operating on groups of nodes...

2008-06-26 Thread TL
What limitations would you put on the node's that could be simultaneously selected? Would they all have to have a common parent node? If not, what would Leo do with a paste of nodes from different parents? TL --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message

Re: operating on groups of nodes...

2008-06-26 Thread Terry Brown
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:42:30 -0700 (PDT) TL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What limitations would you put on the node's that could be simultaneously selected? None... which is already the case with nodes that can be simultaneously marked, of course. Would they all have to have a common parent