On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:11:06 AM UTC-5, tfer wrote:
There are always request for new importers or changes to existing
> importers, few people other than Edward have wrapped their mind around how
> to do this for themselves.
>
The new javascript importer points the way to a simp
On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 12:53:46 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:11:06 AM UTC-5, tfer wrote:
>>
>> There are always request for new importers or changes to existing
>> importers, few people other than Edward have wrapped their mind around how
>>
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:11:06 AM UTC-5, tfer wrote:
>
> There are always request for new importers or changes to existing
> importers, few people other than Edward have wrapped their mind around how
> to do this for themselves. This is a proposal to make this easier for
> people
On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 6:30:04 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> To summarize, your proposal amounts to a request to redesign or refactor
basescanner.py.
In fact, the BaseScanner code already has three phases, as shown by the
tree structure of the BaseScanner class's code. The top l
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:11 AM, 'tfer' via leo-editor <
leo-editor@googlegroups.com> wrote:
There are always request for new importers or changes to existing
> importers, few people other than Edward have wrapped their mind around how
> to do this for themselves. This is a proposal to make
