Benoît Smith wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I recently tried to bring a software from Solaris (featuring Motif) to
> Linux (feat. LessTif), but it looks like the ScrolledWindow,
> ScrolledText & ScrolledList widgets ignore any changes I make regarding
> the values of the XmNx & XmNy resources: whiche
Are you sure you have a recent version of LessTif? I have an application
which uses ScrolledText and have compiled it unmodified with both LessTif,
Motif 1.2.4 and Motif 2.1.30.
Could you please send a code example?
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Benoît Smith wrote:
> I recently tried to bring a softwar
Greetings,
I recently tried to bring a software from Solaris (featuring Motif) to
Linux (feat. LessTif), but it looks like the ScrolledWindow,
ScrolledText & ScrolledList widgets ignore any changes I make regarding
the values of the XmNx & XmNy resources: whichever values I give, the
widgets are
Huh. TopLevelShell also inherits from vendorShell. Ah,
it too just XtInheritRealize, so the depth will be 1.
ApplicationShell inherits from TopLevelShell, so it's
depth will be 2. Shrug. I guess use
wc != xmDialogShellWidgetClass or your fix.
Mitch
> -Original Message-
> From: Marti
Or, more trivially, just call it directly (_XmVendorExtRealize()).
Neither closure nor call_data is used. A workaround would be a
private unsafe version of XtAdd/Remove/Call/Callback; it would be
thread safe if you knew the callers were. You might want more than
one function to be called at rea
Martin,
It has the intended effect of only calling the realize callback
once, but a more proper semantic would be
...
&& IntentedWrapperDepth == 0)
as this would mean wc == vendorShellWidgetClass given what
RealizeDepth() does. So you could as well use that equality
check as well.
Pick a
> > While CVS is non-available I am looking for a summary of what's still
> > to be done related to the "BaseClass" changes:
> >
> > - there was this thread "RE: lesstif-CVS bug: Broken pipe with Grace "
> >w/o a final conclusion. As Martin told me his last suggestion isn't
> >the way
Alexander, Martin
[Alexander wrote]
> While CVS is non-available I am looking for a summary of what's still
> to be done related to the "BaseClass" changes:
>
> - there was this thread "RE: lesstif-CVS bug: Broken pipe with Grace "
>w/o a final conclusion. As Martin told me his last sugge
Hello Lesstif,
Scenario:
lesstif-0.91.4
Motif-2.0 widgets
Redhat 6.2
I get the warning message:
Warning: XtRemoveGrab asked to remove a widget not on the list
twice every time I destroy a toplevel shell.
I've included a simple example, press "Create Window 2" to make
a second window, and whe
Here is a fix for a memory leak in Manager. Its a
simple failure to free when the widget is destroyed.
- Steve
*** lesstif-0.91.3/lib/Xm/Manager.c.origSun Mar 5 07:38:29 2000
--- lesstif-0.91.3/lib/Xm/Manager.c Sun Jul 9 00:50:08 2000
***
*** 853,858
--- 853,863 -
Here is patch for a uninitialized variable problem. The
problem is caused by the way _XmStringGetNextSegment treats
its second argument. See the comment at the top of
_XmStringGetNextSegment.
- Steve
*** lesstif-0.91.3/lib/Xm/XmString.c.orig Wed Jun 14 16:00:12 2000
--- lesstif-0.91.3/li
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:18:28PM +, Carlos A M dos Santos wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Please apply the attached patch to fix the following problems in Xbae
> Imake support:
> * Xbae/Xbae.tmpl contains wrong revision numbers;
> * Xbae/include/Xbae/Imakefile generates a Makefile that is not
Hello
Please apply the attached patch to fix the following problems in Xbae
Imake support:
* Xbae/Xbae.tmpl contains wrong revision numbers;
* Xbae/include/Xbae/Imakefile generates a Makefile that is not
compatible with non-GNU make programs and that removes Matrix.h
Caption.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 02:02:33PM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote:
[...]
> Ok, situation has changed for me here:
> as of now
> command/test3 leaks by 40 bytes
> selectionbox/test9, textf/test8 are down to 36!
Well, on DU with Motif 1.2.4 I get this:
++ command/test3.motif
leaking 950 bytes per C
[Instead of a real reply copy fom archive]
* From: Rick Scott
* Subject: leaks
* Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:10:15 -0700
OK, cvs is back again.
The Text.c fix seems to work, thanks.
Dumb question, I don't use ddd often:
what's this between the toolbar and the source window?
I get another bar with entries
Run:step:next:...
but it is nothing usable. I don't see this on my DU version
of ddd nor on any screenshot.
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
