Randy McMurchy wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/22/06 16:18 CST:
The Man-DB instructions don't mention a test suite at all. This
seems out of the ordinary as I'm used to seeing either a note to
run the tests, or that there are no tests.
I forgot to mention this yesterday. Though
Feldmeier Bernd wrote:
Can someone tell me where
to get these like gentoo ones etc ...
These were pointed to by Tushar Teredesai within the last couple of
weeks in one of the kernel header threads on this very list. The
archives will have the info you're looking for.
BTW: why not to work
EaStErDoM wrote:
make fails at compiling Glibc with that Error:
Please ask about support issues on the LFS support mailing list
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/mail.html
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See th
Chris Staub wrote:
EaStErDoM wrote:
Chris Staub schrieb:
Then you used the wrong version, not the one in the book, though I am
not sure if that's really the problem. Try using the version in the
book and see if that works.
I said that i used the ones of the book. I took them from one of the
EaStErDoM wrote:
Chris Staub schrieb:
Then you used the wrong version, not the one in the book, though I am
not sure if that's really the problem. Try using the version in the
book and see if that works.
I said that i used the ones of the book. I took them from one of their
mirrors what I s
Chris Staub wrote these words on 03/21/06 21:25 CST:
> Have you looked at the LFS Trac ticket on this subject?
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1656
I had forgotten that Gerard opened this ticket after I initially
said something about it on list. Thanks for the reminder.
--
Randy
Hi,
I would like to propose adding more sanity checks to the book since
toolchain adjustment seems to be the primary source of operator error
for newbies. Here's what I'm thinking.
Ch. 5.7 Adjusting:
gcc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose &> dummy.log
readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools' # confirms specs spec
Chris Staub schrieb:
EaStErDoM wrote:
make fails at compiling Glibc with that Error:
In file included from ../include/stdlib.h:8,
from ./gconv_int.h:24,
from gconv.c:23:
../stdlib/stdlib.h:617: warning: '__malloc__' attribute ignored
In file included from ./gco
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/22/06 16:18 CST:
> The Man-DB instructions don't mention a test suite at all. This
> seems out of the ordinary as I'm used to seeing either a note to
> run the tests, or that there are no tests.
I forgot to mention this yesterday. Though I'm sure Alexander i
EaStErDoM wrote:
make fails at compiling Glibc with that Error:
In file included from ../include/stdlib.h:8,
from ./gconv_int.h:24,
from gconv.c:23:
../stdlib/stdlib.h:617: warning: '__malloc__' attribute ignored
In file included from ./gconv_int.h:24,
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Noted in the book that the Groff package creates a zsoelim file
in /usr/bin (which is a symlink), and is described in the "installed
programs" section.
Please remove the symlink and move the description to the Man-DB page.
A little bit later, Man-DB comes along and trum
make fails at compiling Glibc with that Error:
In file included from ../include/stdlib.h:8,
from ./gconv_int.h:24,
from gconv.c:23:
../stdlib/stdlib.h:617: warning: '__malloc__' attribute ignored
In file included from ./gconv_int.h:24,
from gconv.c:
Hi all,
I am looking for some scripts for
kernel header sanitization to
examine other approaches.
Can someone tell me where
to get these like gentoo ones etc ...
BTW: why not to work together with
e.g. gentoo group?
Makes no sense to me that
every party makes its one way
for this not easy st
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
BLFS is not the right place to work around libc bugs.
Agreed. If someone could cook up a patch for glibc-2.3.6 I'd appreciate
it.
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/kd.h.diff?cvsroot=glibc&r1=1.
14 matches
Mail list logo
