Re: LFS Roadmap (Was: Re: As promised: LFS compilation summary)

2008-05-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that the prevailing attitude here is rather anti GRUB2. Mostly because development on it seems to focus on items perceived as useless and bloat for a boot loader. I haven't piped in on this at all, but I'd just

Re: LFS Roadmap (Was: Re: As promised: LFS compilation summary)

2008-05-09 Thread Dennis Clarke
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that the prevailing attitude here is rather anti GRUB2. Mostly because development on it seems to focus on items perceived as useless