On 11/27/2012 11:13 AM, xinglp wrote:
The Udev-196 only create /dev/disk/by-path.
They are present on my system, but I am still using udev/systemd 195.
$ ls -l /dev/disk/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 460 Nov 27 16:04 by-id
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Nov 27 16:04 by-path
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:42 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:13 +0800, xinglp wrote:
The Udev-196 only create /dev/disk/by-path.
Confirmed. I'll take a look.
Well, 2 hours later and I'm stumped. I've run 'udevadm --debug
test /sys/block/sda /root/udevadm-test.lst 21'
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
At this point, I ran the jhalfs configuration and then started the LFS
build. It's running now. I'll update this when it's done.
Just following up on this.
First, the Intel Atom, at least model D2700, does not have 4 cores. It
has 2 cores, each with hyper threading.
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:42 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:13 +0800, xinglp wrote:
The Udev-196 only create /dev/disk/by-path.
Confirmed. I'll take a look.
Actually, my symptoms are slightly different. I only
get /dev/disk/by-id. I get no other symlinks
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 21:10 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
Actually, my symptoms are slightly different. I only
get /dev/disk/by-id. I get no other symlinks
(by-uuid,by-label,by-path). I wonder whether this is some kind of race
condition, whereby the first symlink gets created fine but that
On 11/27/2012 10:10 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:42 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:13 +0800, xinglp wrote:
The Udev-196 only create /dev/disk/by-path.
Confirmed. I'll take a look.
Actually, my symptoms are slightly different. I only
get
Armin K. wrote:
On 11/27/2012 10:10 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:42 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:13 +0800, xinglp wrote:
The Udev-196 only create /dev/disk/by-path.
Confirmed. I'll take a look.
Actually, my symptoms are slightly different. I
On 11/27/2012 11:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
I just asked on their irc channel and some people claim that everything
is okay even with latest git master, but they are probably using udev
and systemd together.
So much for we will continue to support standalone udev. It may
On 11/27/2012 11:23 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
So much for we will continue to support standalone udev. It may take
me some time, but I'll figure it out.
OTOH, a look at mdev may be appropriate.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev
-- Bruce
They
Armin K. wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:23 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
So much for we will continue to support standalone udev. It may take
me some time, but I'll figure it out.
OTOH, a look at mdev may be appropriate.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev
They
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:39:05PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Just following up on this.
First, the Intel Atom, at least model D2700, does not have 4 cores. It
has 2 cores, each with hyper threading. This gives the appearance of 4
cores but not the performance.
I
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:42:13PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
Sorry, I forgot ... This is forked udev repo https://github.com/gentoo/eudev
Thanks for the links. I'm reading them.
-- Bruce
I'm still waiting to see how that pans out, and wondering why these
devs
Ken Moffat wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 126K Nov 27 11:03 config-3.2.0-4-amd64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 74K Nov 27 13:41 config-3.6.7-lfs-20121122
Don't you use /proc/config.gz ? Sure, it doesn't take a lot of
space, but I either use a good kernel and
'zcat /proc/config.gz .config' or I
13 matches
Mail list logo
