Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10233 - in trunk/BOOK: chapter05 chapter06

2013-03-29 Thread xinglp
2013/3/30 > Author: matthew > Date: Fri Mar 29 12:50:55 2013 > New Revision: 10233 > > Log: > Fix the alignment of some command continuation constructs. > > Modified: >trunk/BOOK/chapter05/binutils-pass1.xml >trunk/BOOK/chapter05/binutils-pass2.xml >trunk/BOOK/chapter05/gcc-pass1.xml

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10230 - in trunk/BOOK: chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

2013-03-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 15:36 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I'd still prefer something along the line of "Hey, this package builds >> something we really don't need here, but breaks the build because it has >> not caught up with newer tools. We'll just skip that here and fix i

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10230 - in trunk/BOOK: chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

2013-03-29 Thread Matt Burgess
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 15:36 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I'd still prefer something along the line of "Hey, this package builds > something we really don't need here, but breaks the build because it has > not caught up with newer tools. We'll just skip that here and fix it > properly in Chapter

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10230 - in trunk/BOOK: chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

2013-03-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 15:06 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I agree that we shouldn't go out of the way to disable unneeded portions >> of builds, but I do not think we should be fixing them if they are >> broken either. If they cause a problem, then disable them in Chapter 5.

Re: [lfs-dev] /opt

2013-03-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Roger Koehler wrote: > Bruce Dubbs gmail.com> writes: >> Personally, I'd just put python in /usr and let it go at that. Putting >> Xorg in /opt is not difficult to do. > > I gave in to the temptation to just copy the library to /usr/lib. > > Ideally, I would like to consider LFS my 'default insta

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10230 - in trunk/BOOK: chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

2013-03-29 Thread Matt Burgess
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 15:06 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I agree that we shouldn't go out of the way to disable unneeded portions > of builds, but I do not think we should be fixing them if they are > broken either. If they cause a problem, then disable them in Chapter 5. > The only time they

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10230 - in trunk/BOOK: chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

2013-03-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matt Burgess wrote: > On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 14:51 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> matt...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: >>> Author: matthew >>> Date: Fri Mar 29 12:37:50 2013 >>> New Revision: 10230 >>> >>> Log: >>> Fix Binutils' texinfo file in pass1 and pass2 in case hosts >> have Texinfo >= 5.1

Re: [lfs-dev] /opt

2013-03-29 Thread Roger Koehler
Bruce Dubbs gmail.com> writes: > Personally, I'd just put python in /usr and let it go at that. Putting > Xorg in /opt is not difficult to do. I gave in to the temptation to just copy the library to /usr/lib. Ideally, I would like to consider LFS my 'default installation', and install all ad

Re: [lfs-dev] /opt

2013-03-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Roger Koehler wrote: > Bruce Dubbs gmail.com> writes: >> Roger Koehler wrote: >>> How do I configure Python to use /opt/lib? >> >> Try 'export LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/lib' >> >> Note that LD_LIBRARY_PATH and /etc/ld.so.conf are used at runtime, not >> build time. > > Thank you, Bruce. That fixed python

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10230 - in trunk/BOOK: chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

2013-03-29 Thread Matt Burgess
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 14:51 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > matt...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: > > Author: matthew > > Date: Fri Mar 29 12:37:50 2013 > > New Revision: 10230 > > > > Log: > > Fix Binutils' texinfo file in pass1 and pass2 in case hosts > have Texinfo >= 5.1 installed. > > > > Modi

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10230 - in trunk/BOOK: chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

2013-03-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
matt...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: > Author: matthew > Date: Fri Mar 29 12:37:50 2013 > New Revision: 10230 > > Log: > Fix Binutils' texinfo file in pass1 and pass2 in case hosts have Texinfo >= 5.1 installed. > > Modified: > trunk/BOOK/chapter01/changelog.xml > trunk/BOOK/chapter05/

Re: [lfs-dev] /opt

2013-03-29 Thread Roger Koehler
Bruce Dubbs gmail.com> writes: > Roger Koehler wrote: > > How do I configure Python to use /opt/lib? > > Try 'export LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/lib' > > Note that LD_LIBRARY_PATH and /etc/ld.so.conf are used at runtime, not > build time. Thank you, Bruce. That fixed python. Unfortunately, I am still

Re: [lfs-dev] /opt

2013-03-29 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Roger Koehler wrote: > I am trying to install BLFS with prefix=/opt instead of /usr. I've gotten > as far as xcb-proto, but it depends on Python, which I also tried > installing in /opt. Everything seemed fine until I tried running python. > I get this message: > > python: error while loading s

[lfs-dev] /opt

2013-03-29 Thread Roger Koehler
I am trying to install BLFS with prefix=/opt instead of /usr. I've gotten as far as xcb-proto, but it depends on Python, which I also tried installing in /opt. Everything seemed fine until I tried running python. I get this message: python: error while loading shared libraries: libpython2.7.so.

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10220 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 prologue

2013-03-29 Thread Matt Burgess
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 19:41 +, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 19:47 +0100, Armin K. wrote: > > > FYI, there's --disable-install-libiberty configure option - no need for > > seds to prevent its installation. > > Well spotted. I'm testing a build with that in now. And it doesn't

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-support] Binutils-2.23.2 - Pass 1 build error.

2013-03-29 Thread Matt Burgess
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 07:02 +0100, Armin K. wrote: > On 03/29/2013 04:18 AM, xinglp wrote: > > log is > > > > ../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:325: unknown command `colophon' > > ../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:336: unknown command `cygnus' > > > > > > > > I noticed that l