DJ Lucas wrote:
Jan 10, 1998 to overcome a problem with linux-2.1.18.
Whoops. Wrong long entry! Let me correct that Mar 31, 2004 to correct
a problem with 2.4 and 2.6. May still be unneeded.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscrat
Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Son, 2006-03-19 at 12:28 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
I'm using with the compat headers (modified from Jurg's version of the
script) and glibc-2.3.6. Did not use Jurg's patch, well I did, but came
across the same types of errors. After adding to ipaddress.c
and ifstat.c,
On Son, 2006-03-19 at 12:28 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Jürg Billeter wrote:
> >
> > Yes, as I've written before, iproute2 is one of the problematic
> > packages. Besides fixing the includes[1] you need to remove the local
> > copy of the not sanitized kernel headers, i.e. rm -r include/linux[2]
> I
Jürg Billeter wrote:
Yes, as I've written before, iproute2 is one of the problematic
packages. Besides fixing the includes[1] you need to remove the local
copy of the not sanitized kernel headers, i.e. rm -r include/linux[2]
Jürg
[1]
http://www.paldo.org/paldo/sources/iproute2/iproute2-2.6.15
On Son, 2006-03-19 at 00:31 +, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > I've integrated most of your changes and put it online at
> > http://www.paldo.org/headers/linux-glibc-headers-20060318
> > I changed the error messages in linux/compiler.h and linux/config.h to
> > warnings to reall
Jürg Billeter wrote:
I've integrated most of your changes and put it online at
http://www.paldo.org/headers/linux-glibc-headers-20060318
I changed the error messages in linux/compiler.h and linux/config.h to
warnings to really be a compatibility header.
Thanks Jürg. With that script I made the
Jürg Billeter wrote:
> It's right that they gain nothing in the for loops. I've added the
> "backticks" to the REMOVE_HEADERS lines on purpose, though, as the
> shell doesn't expand braces when defining variables but probably
> there is a better way to get expanded variables, don't know.
Hmm...
Jürg Billeter wrote:
I've also removed the asm-generic
flattening as I don't see any benefit in doing that but maybe there is,
then please explain.
Not really any benifit other than it was done with previous LLH. The
one minor benefit is one less directory. That's it. :-) It adds about
3
On Sam, 2006-03-18 at 08:24 -0500, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
> > for FILE in `echo
> > linux/{acct.h,quota.h,resource.h,socket.h,stat.h,time.h,timex.h,un.h,wait.h}`
>
> Er, hang on here -- why are the echo and the backquotes in there? (I
> should note that they're in Jürg's script a
On Fre, 2006-03-17 at 23:37 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Using the above notes, I've added the following to Jürg's version of the
> script so to create the 'compatibility' headers. Of course these
> could be created once and be copied too...just figured I'd add to the
> script so no local files m
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
for FILE in `echo
linux/{acct.h,quota.h,resource.h,socket.h,stat.h,time.h,timex.h,un.h,wait.h}`
Er, hang on here -- why are the echo and the backquotes in there? (I
should note that they're in Jürg's script as well.) They gain nothing,
and waste at leas
DJ Lucas wrote:
> for FILE in `echo
> linux/{acct.h,quota.h,resource.h,socket.h,stat.h,time.h,timex.h,un.h,wait.h}`
Er, hang on here -- why are the echo and the backquotes in there? (I
should note that they're in Jürg's script as well.) They gain nothing,
and waste at least one process. (I bel
Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Die, 2006-03-14 at 22:01 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Die, 2006-03-14 at 14:10 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
* Verify headers with real applications
Will do a full distro (800 packages) recompilation with these headers
sometime this week and fix headers resp. applica
13 matches
Mail list logo
