Re: Text wrapping bug in bootscripts (on plain ASCII)

2005-05-12 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Nathan Coulson wrote: BTW, does the # work under ash? [the Counting Characters part, not the international part. (Internationalzation for someone who wants to use ash, is probably not a major concern)] Then ${#STRING} construction works properly in ash in all 8-bit locales. -- Alexander E. Patrak

Re: Text wrapping bug in bootscripts (on plain ASCII)

2005-05-12 Thread Nathan Coulson
On 5/12/05, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Robertson wrote: > > I usually run frame buffer consoles at > > 1024x768 or larger and hate it when a message comes up formated for a > > 80x25 console - ugh. > > On the other hand, I have trouble following long lines (more than,

Re: Text wrapping bug in bootscripts (on plain ASCII)

2005-05-12 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
James Robertson wrote: I usually run frame buffer consoles at 1024x768 or larger and hate it when a message comes up formated for a 80x25 console - ugh. On the other hand, I have trouble following long lines (more than, say, 90 characters) after reading thoughts of Donald Knuth on the optimal

Re: Text wrapping bug in bootscripts (on plain ASCII)

2005-05-12 Thread James Robertson
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: Hello, Text wrapping is broken for multiline messages even on plain ASCII, as you can see on the attached screenshot (the problem with this bootscripts exiting unexpectedly is already fixed, but I am talking about wrong wrapping here, not the bad version of the autos

Text wrapping bug in bootscripts (on plain ASCII)

2005-05-12 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Hello, Text wrapping is broken for multiline messages even on plain ASCII, as you can see on the attached screenshot (the problem with this bootscripts exiting unexpectedly is already fixed, but I am talking about wrong wrapping here, not the bad version of the autosshd bootscript). The line af