On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
That's my prime objection to Greg's method - we always tell people
fbbg, but the comparison takes a shortcut.
Right, but for the purposes of testing, the environment should be as
consistent as possible. That's standard procedure for running a test
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Ken Moffat wrote:
I seem to recall that in repeated standard LFS i686 builds, these same
binaries can in fact differ, without anybody ever quite knowing why - this is
why Greg's ICA, at least last time I looked, did -three- builds to compare
which bytes always differed.
On 12/16/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip everything
Ken, I seemed to have offended you and I'm sorry that happened. I
really don't mean to bad mouth the way you've tested or the tool
you've created to assist. I was only arguing the case for doing ICA
for the sake of testing the
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 12/16/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip everything
Ken, I seemed to have offended you and I'm sorry that happened. I
really don't mean to bad mouth the way you've tested or the tool
you've created to assist. I was only arguing the
Ryan Oliver wrote:
We require 2.6 for current lfs to build nptl (though not if the initial
toolchain is replaced with a cross-lfs style setup).
So, build a 2.6 kernel and install module-init-tools :P
And yes, there are needed package upgrades that need to be done on the
host from old
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 12/16/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just seemed that you were taking offense to my suggestions or you
assumed I was taking shots at your tool. If not, then that's good
because I didn't mean either.
Great
As pertains to the testing, I
On 12/16/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
You sound like you've done the recursive build a number of times and
anticipate these differences in farce. I'd rather nip that one in the
bud and just keep the same environment.
Not exactly a
Hi
Interesting thread :-/
First up, ICA is not the be all and end all. It's just another tool in the
armory in ensuring a good build. And it's not perfect either..
It's amazing how such a simple concept can apparently be troublesome for
some folks to grasp. I was hoping my scripts would have
Greg Schafer wrote:
It's amazing how such a simple concept can apparently be troublesome for
some folks to grasp.
What I have trouble understanding is the fact that, apparently, one
shouldn't reboot during the ICA cycle. What I thought was trying to be
proved here was that a) any suitable
Hi,
In light of a some recent requests to lfs-support on this subject,
I've decided to ping the list with this patch again.
This issue is that when running gcc-3.4.3 or 3.4.4 on Linux-2.6.12+
breaks precompiled headers (PCH) due to an introduction of a feature
called exec-shield-randomize. This
10 matches
Mail list logo
