[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Developers,
I am working on an up to date Fedora core 3 sytem.
I have been trying to build LFS-6.1.*etc and have repeated failures
when I get to tcl8.4.9-src.tar.gz.
Each time I try to build it fails on this error:
./../compat/strstr.c : In function `strstr':
I tried to slavishly follow your directions.
I was doing the initial compile of binutils.
Everything went swimmingly for 105 seconds, then I got:
make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/gas'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/gas -I.
-D_GNU_SOURCE -I.
Hi
i just compiled a LFS with gcc 4
i had the same problem. I solved it by removing this -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes in the Makefile
this should help
Tobias Lieber
I tried to slavishly follow your directions.
I was doing the initial compile of binutils.
Everything went
erm...
this will be not the last error you will receiv.
the hardest package is glibc. Needed several patches, but i foudn them all via
google. They were all from a RH mailinglist or so...
have a lot of fun
Tobias Lieber
Hi
i just compiled a LFS with gcc 4
i had the same problem. I
Tobias Lieber wrote:
snip
The best place to look for gcc4 patches is fedora cvs
(http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/)
From
Andrew
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
El Lunes, 4 de Julio de 2005 19:43, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
I'm not trying to be a stick in the mud here, and Manuel, I do
appreciate all your good work and efforts to make things more fluid, but
after trying to edit the new cross-lfs book several times and *still*
getting lost and turned
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Lunes, 4 de Julio de 2005 19:43, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
I'm not trying to be a stick in the mud here, and Manuel, I do
appreciate all your good work and efforts to make things more fluid, but
after trying to edit the new cross-lfs book several times and *still*
Kim McCall wrote:
The offending line of tc-i386.h reads:
extern const struct relax_type md_relax_table[];
Is there a problem with trying to compile using the latest gcc,
distributed with FC4? (I guess I missed the memo).
Btw, yes, the current LFS book(s) will not work with gcc4. There needs
El Lunes, 4 de Julio de 2005 22:05, Jim Gifford escribió:
I wouln't say it failed, I think we should just keep it architecure
specific.
It failed on their current form. The xpointer expesions used aren't useful for
moving targets. That is the big issue: if there is a change on the nodes
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 10:53:50AM -0700, Kim McCall wrote:
On a much more minor note, the recommended gcc package is listed as
GCC (3.4.3) - 17,714 KB:
but the only 3.4.3 tarball I could find describes itself as 26.2M in size.
Working on it. Thanks for the report!
--
Archaic
Want
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Kim McCall wrote:
The 6.1-pre1 book's package list,
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.1-pre1/chapter03/packages.html
recommends downloading Shadow (4.0.9) - 996 KB:
ftp://ftp.pld.org.pl/software/shadow/
I'll add a note, similar to that for 'file' on
On July 2, 2005 11:16 am, Robert Connolly wrote:
Maybe someone knows a friendly isp who will adjust charges month to month
based on usage. Also, it would be a nice kick if the server was a legal
non-profit company, maybe some sort of charity, so that contributions could
be tax deductable (this
DJ Lucas wrote:
hotplug-2004_09_23.tar.bz2, old
Or maybe not. Sorry. Problem still exists in most recent pre.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
precious physical space. At least with the LFS server's current 4U rack. If I
can find a way to put the hardware in a 1U rackmount, there won't be an
issue. I can squeeze it in anywhere and have LFS dedicated again.
Ah, so then we need to put out a call for a decent 1U
Ah, so then we need to put out a call for a decent 1U server, eh?
Anyone?
/me goes looking on ebay.
I've found some Cobalt RAQs that have been pretty cheap on eBay. :) Might
wanna take a look for 'em. :)
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 09:10:20PM -0400, David Fix wrote:
I've found some Cobalt RAQs that have been pretty cheap on eBay. :) Might
wanna take a look for 'em. :)
NOOO :) Those things are pitifully slow. Not to mention things
have to be done quite differently on mips boxes.
--
SBU is still referred to as Static Binutils Unit.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
17 matches
Mail list logo
