Mark Rosenstand wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 07:46 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 11/30/05, Feldmeier Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys,
I created a LFS 6.1.1 test system.
But is there a problem if I use
the latest kernel version ?
Because Using Linux-Libc-Headers version
and
Mark Rosenstand wrote:
Matt Darcy wrote:
Mark Rosenstand wrote:
And I run a dovecot IMAP server without inotify-support on a
inotify-enabled Linux 2.6.14 machine because it couldn't find
linux/inotify.h
And what is your experience with this ?
Do you find that inotify works/is picked up by
Andrew Benton wrote:
Bing. You hit the nail on the head there. As Richard said, Fedora Core 4
isn't a suitable distro to build the stable version of the book. It
should work OK for the development version but that may not be suitable
if it's your first attempt at LFS. I've had good results
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:04:50 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
Bing. You hit the nail on the head there. As Richard said, Fedora Core 4
isn't a suitable distro to build the stable version of the book. It
should work OK for the development version but
On 12/1/05, Mark Rosenstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like it to use inotify, but it doesn't because the headers are
too old. I never really understood why most (all?) distributors choose
to use kernel headers that doesn't match the running kernel.
It's up to the userspace package
On 12/1/05, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/1/05, Mark Rosenstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like it to use inotify, but it doesn't because the headers are
too old. I never really understood why most (all?) distributors choose
to use kernel headers that doesn't match the
Dan Nicholson wrote:
As a follow up to this comment, beagle also uses inotify. I built it
with l-l-h-2.6.12.0, and it works fine now that I've upgraded my
kernel to 2.6.14. How? beagle (appropriately) includes inotify.h in
it's source tree.
Just as a point of interest, what happens if one
On 12/1/05, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
As a follow up to this comment, beagle also uses inotify. I built it
with l-l-h-2.6.12.0, and it works fine now that I've upgraded my
kernel to 2.6.14. How? beagle (appropriately) includes inotify.h in
it's
Hi guys,
nice discussion about that very important stuff.
I began this discussion earlier ...
So maybe someone could clarify this stuff clearly ...
a) dependency of kernel version and linux-libc-header version
b) problems occuring
c) real meaning of sanatized headers (why ...)
d) creating our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
Chapter 3.2 of LFS 6.1.1
URL:http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.1.1/chapter03/packages.html
lists URL:http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/ as download
location for man-pages-2.01. This package is not/no longer available
from
Nico R. wrote:
I suggest finding a mirror which still has version 2.01 of man-pages and
including the correct URIs in the LFS 6.1 and 6.1.1 errata.
LFS has its own package mirrors. On it are the packages for LFS version
6.0 to Development. There is no sense in adding download locations to
Bernd Feldmeier wrote:
a) dependency of kernel version and linux-libc-header version
None whatsoever. These are two different packages, with two different
reasons for existing.
l-l-h is based on the kernel headers, but you can use any version of
either of them (well, no, that isn't quite
As you may be aware, there is a new implementation of ALFS available,
called jhalfs. The main purpose of jhalfs is to provide a pure reference
build of LFS by extracting the commands to run directly from the LFS
book. This has the added benefit of reducing maintenance as there are no
profiles
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm working with qt on a fresh lfs-dev system. The latest suitable for
KDE is version 3.3.5. I've built about all the dependencies and am
trying to get qt validated.
My access is via a chroot from an LFS 6.1 system.
During the make, I am getting a segfault from the
The LFS LiveCD Team is proud to announce the release of the x86-6.1.1-1
version of the LFS LiveCD. This version is built using LFS 6.1.1 and
BLFS packages from the svn branch. Packages for LFS 6.1.1 are included
on the LiveCD. Other new features:
* XFCE Terminal with helpful menus,
Congrats to all of the members of the LFS team. This is really a great
achievement for us.
Gossip is like a photograph. It starts with a negative, then is developed
and enlarged
---
Regards
Mukesh Kaushal
- Original Message -
From: Justin R. Knierim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Development
16 matches
Mail list logo
