Re: [lfs-dev] littles mistakes in lfs?

2017-02-09 Thread Bruce Dubbs
amj wrote: Hello, I've (re)read carefully the beginning of LFS and I've found these things. http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/systemd/prologue/standards.html Packages supplied by LFS needed to satisfy the LSB Requirements LSB Core: [...], GTK+2, [...] There are no gtk libs in LFS isn't

[lfs-dev] littles mistakes in lfs?

2017-02-09 Thread amj
Hello, I've (re)read carefully the beginning of LFS and I've found these things. http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/systemd/prologue/standards.html Packages supplied by LFS needed to satisfy the LSB Requirements LSB Core: [...], GTK+2, [...] There are no gtk libs in LFS isn't it ? (the

Re: [lfs-dev] gold

2017-02-09 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:14:34PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote: > > > I could have sworn the gold testsuite was a mess, but I just ran it and all > 243 tests pass. Commit coming shortly. > Well it certainly looks messy compared to the other parts of binutils, and for me every result (when it finally