Re: [lfs-dev] Some comments on the test results.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:14:01PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > On 6/19/20 11:58 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 16:26 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > > I've now been through my test logs for the new build (on my i7 > > > haswell). > > > > > >

Re: [lfs-dev] Some comments on the test results.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 06:58:42PM +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 16:26 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > I've now been through my test logs for the new build (on my i7 > > haswell). > > > > Here are a few comments (in order of testing) > > > >

Re: [lfs-dev] Some comments on the test results.

On 6/19/20 11:58 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 16:26 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: I've now been through my test logs for the new build (on my i7 haswell). Here are a few comments (in order of testing) bison-3.6.3 --- Here, I strongly disagree

Re: [lfs-dev] Some comments on the test results.

On 2020-06-19 18:58 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 16:26 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > > I've now been through my test logs for the new build (on my i7 > > haswell). > > > > Here are a few comments (in order of testing) > > > > glibc-2.31.0 > >

Re: [lfs-dev] Some comments on the test results.

On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 16:26 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > I've now been through my test logs for the new build (on my i7 > haswell). > > Here are a few comments (in order of testing) > > glibc-2.31.0 > > > We say "misc/tst-ttyname is known to fail in the LFS chroot >

[lfs-dev] Some comments on the test results.

I've now been through my test logs for the new build (on my i7 haswell). Here are a few comments (in order of testing) glibc-2.31.0 We say "misc/tst-ttyname is known to fail in the LFS chroot environment." But for me it was skipped (I'm running a 5.7.2 kernel, with 5.7.2 headers