Re: [lfs-dev] Linux 4.14.12 CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC and elfutils

2018-01-09 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Victor Wren wrote: Currently the book instructions in SVN aren't quite adequate to deal with the 4.14.12 kernel, as-shipped.  The default configuration sets "CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y" which requires elflib to compile.  Using "make menuconfig," the only option seems to be selecting between ORC

Re: [lfs-dev] Linux 4.14.12 CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC and elfutils

2018-01-09 Thread Victor Wren
On 1/9/2018 09:02, Victor Wren wrote:  I'm stumped as to what switch enables stack validation and the ORC unwinder that depends on libelf.  The only way I've seen online to disable stack validation is to manually edit the .config file. Looking through the Makefiles, if I am reading it at all

[lfs-dev] Linux 4.14.12 CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC and elfutils

2018-01-09 Thread Victor Wren
Currently the book instructions in SVN aren't quite adequate to deal with the 4.14.12 kernel, as-shipped.  The default configuration sets "CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y" which requires elflib to compile.  Using "make menuconfig," the only option seems to be selecting between ORC unwinder, and frame

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-4.14.12

2018-01-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Thomas Trepl wrote: looks like we will get a lot of new dot versions these days. What do you think about using the linux-4.14.tar-xz + patch-4.14.x.xz archives instead of the whole source archive? Would decrease the download size from >100MB to 0.37MB for each dot version. Users can do that

Re: [lfs-dev] linux-4.14.12

2018-01-06 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 09:21:32AM +0100, Thomas Trepl wrote: > looks like we will get a lot of new dot versions these days. > > What do you think about using the linux-4.14.tar-xz + patch-4.14.x.xz > archives instead of the whole source archive? Would decrease the > download size from >100MB