Re: [lfs-dev] vim

2019-12-13 Thread Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 01:50:34PM -0600, Douglas R. Reno via lfs-dev wrote: > > On 12/13/19 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > > The vim versions change daily, sometimes multiple times per day. There > > is a new minor version 8.2.0 as of yesterday, but there is already a > > (trivial)

Re: [lfs-dev] vim

2019-12-13 Thread Douglas R. Reno via lfs-dev
On 12/13/19 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: The vim versions change daily, sometimes multiple times per day. There is a new minor version 8.2.0 as of yesterday, but there is already a (trivial) 8.2.0001. There were over 2400 "releases" to version 8.1 before 8.2 was released. We can

Re: [lfs-dev] ipv6

2019-12-13 Thread DJ Lucas via lfs-dev
On December 12, 2019 10:17:24 AM CST, Joel Bion via lfs-dev wrote: >I agree with what Uwe is saying 100%. > >IPv6 use is increasing - right now Google is seeing 24.9% of its >incoming daily traffic is IPv6, of course a lot of that has to do with >mobile devices. > >But nobody can really ignore

Re: [lfs-dev] vim

2019-12-13 Thread Joel Bion via lfs-dev
Stick with the x.y.0 is my vote, but my vote is tempered by this uncertainty: usually, when a team declares a “release” there’s a feature freeze, then testing with only bug fixes, etc. in other words, a release is different than a patch. But, is that the case with vim? Or is the “release” just

[lfs-dev] vim

2019-12-13 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
The vim versions change daily, sometimes multiple times per day. There is a new minor version 8.2.0 as of yesterday, but there is already a (trivial) 8.2.0001. There were over 2400 "releases" to version 8.1 before 8.2 was released. We can continue to update to the latest patch version before