>On 02/10/2019 10:07 AM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
>> On 2019-02-10 09:54 -0600, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2019 06:41 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 10/02/2019 08:45, Brandon Murry via lfs-dev wrote:
> Hi, I hope this is the right place to put this.
>
Hi,
Accroding to the relase note of glibc 2.28
(https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-08/msg3.html), GNU make 4.0
or later is now required to build glibc.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above
>On 03/27/2018 06:25 AM, hykw...@sina.com wrote:
>> I could not build Coreutils 8.29 with Automake 1.16.1 because of the error
>> message "aclocal-1.15 cannot not found". (automake 1.16.1 >generates
>> aclocal-1.16 in the /usr/bin)
>> It seems that Coreutils 8.29 supports the version "1.15" only
I could not build Coreutils 8.29 with Automake 1.16.1 because of the error
message "aclocal-1.15 cannot not found". (automake 1.16.1 generates
aclocal-1.16 in the /usr/bin)
It seems that Coreutils 8.29 supports the version "1.15" only because of the
settings in the file "aclocal.m4".
--
Section 6.32: "First, fix a problem introduced with glibc-2.26:" <-- In LFS
8.2, glibc-2.27 is used
Section 6.61: "Required disk space: 49OB MB" <-- incorrect size
On the other hand, in the web site,
1. The version of the "Errata" pages for both LFS and BLFS is 8.1.
2. For both "Read online"
>On Mon, 5 Feb 2018, hykw...@sina.com wrote:
>> I got the following message when I built the Linux kernel 4.15:
>>
>> fatal error: openssl/bio.h: No such file or directory
>>
>> I found this header file is required by the file "scripts/extract-cert.c"
>>
>> So, which kernel option should I uncheck
I got the following message when I built the Linux kernel 4.15:
fatal error: openssl/bio.h: No such file or directory
I found this header file is required by the file "scripts/extract-cert.c"
So, which kernel option should I uncheck in order to fix this issue?
That's because OpenSSL is not
