Hugo Bernier wrote:
On 9/10/05, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I think this needs looking into. Has anyone filed a bug?
[snip]
I just did :-)
What's the number of the bug? a search for tcl in BLFS bugzilla gets me Zarro
Boogs found...
--
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
I was checking out the various Mozilla projects and found that they
also release NSPR and NSS indepndently of Mozilla. Given that Firefox,
Thunderbird and few other packages link gaim depend on NSS libraries,
it would probably be useful to build these libraries separately
Keith wrote:
Ran into some make check failures with Libtool-1.5.14. All tests passed
right up until the end...
FAIL: f77demo-static.test
SKIP: f77demo-make.test
SKIP: f77demo-exec.test
FAIL: f77demo-conf.test
SKIP: f77demo-make.test
SKIP: f77demo-exec.test
FAIL: f77demo-shared.test
SKIP:
Hi,
Rainer Peter Feller said:
hm may be full disc?
No, There is really a lot of free space.
BTW, is there a reason that sending mail from a gmail web client
is always blocked ? It says the it suspect that the subject
contains spam, even if is one word (like error).In fact,this message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, is there a reason that sending mail from a gmail web client
is always blocked ? It says the it suspect that the subject
contains spam, even if is one word (like error).In fact,this message
is sent from telnet
Try turning off the Rich Formatting feature of
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 13:49 +, randhir phagura wrote:
After the above, I hunted for 'gtk-sharp-1.9.5', installed it and started
configure command again for 'monodevelop-0.7'. This time i get the
following:
While 1.9.5 ought to be valid, it's not the current version. Consider
trying
Hello,
Thanks; I was not aware of; I tried it now and if this mail
arrives, than the
Rich Fomatting was indeed the problem...
Regards,
Sting
On 9/11/05, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, is there a reason that sending mail from a gmail web client
Hi,
This is my first lfs install, and i am experiencing some problems.
I am trying to compile gcc (second pass) and it cannot found the
gnu/stub.h file.
I have looked and it is not in the /tools/include directory. However, my
host system does have it. Can i simply copy it over or does this
Hi.
I just compiled lfs from the latest live-cd. I deactivated loadable module
support in the kernel, but after rebooting realized that the bootscripts need
this option to be enabled because the hotplug script runs scripts from inside
the modules dir...
this is a little bit confusing as in
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, rblythe wrote:
I checked my config/cf/host.def and it does contain the line:
#define HasFreetype2 YES
And it is not commented out.
Here are the lines in ftconfig.h that I believe are driving the error
messages:
/* The size of an `int' type. */
#if FT_UINT_MAX ==
Torsten Vollmann wrote:
Hi.
I just compiled lfs from the latest live-cd. I deactivated loadable module
support in the kernel, but after rebooting realized that the bootscripts need
this option to be enabled because the hotplug script runs scripts from inside
the modules dir...
Just build
Bhishma wrote:
Hi,
This is my first lfs install, and i am experiencing some problems.
I am trying to compile gcc (second pass) and it cannot found the
gnu/stub.h file.
Perhaps you mean gnu/stubs.h? It should have been installed as part of glibc.
It sounds like you had a problem installing
Hi frank,
Tks for your advice.
the appropriate LogLevel in cupsd.conf and check
/var/cups/log/error_log for details.
checked /var/log/cups/access_log
localhost - root [11/Sep/2005:03:22:41 +0800] GET /printers/HP_Printer
HTTP/1.1 200 3494
localhost - root [11/Sep/2005:03:22:42 +0800]
Hello,
I get an error when configuring gcc for re-installation (LFS 6.1 - section
5.11.1 ).
Here is the output :
loading cache ./config.cache
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
warning: ld-linux.so.2, needed by /tools/lib/libc.so.6, not found (try using
-rpath or -rpath-link)
Something went wrong with your glibc installation.
Hi... it's me again...
I was happy because firefox and thunderbird started without a
segfault... But know I noticed, that firefox doensn't open SSL-sites
with the prompt SSL is disabled. I enabled SSL and the site works. I
close firefox, start it again later and no setting is kept.
What's wrong
In /mnt/lfs/tools/ I have a link ld-linux.so.2 redirecting to
ld-2.3.4.so (in the same directory).
Is that correct ?
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Something went wrong with your glibc installation.
/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 should be installed by chapter 5 glibc
(section 5.6). The errors that
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Stephen Liu wrote:
Furthermore upgrade package will also be another problem to me. How to
remove the old package? It may affect another package. It may not be
so simple as RPM packages. Can any folk shed me some light.
Upgrades depend on what the packages is:
Christopher Beppler wrote these words on 09/11/05 07:59 CST:
if I remove the .firefox, .thunderbird and .mozilla-dirs I cannot start
again, because the ugly segfault problem. What should I do?
If it were me, I'd remove every trace of firefox from your system,
including any mozilla directory
It actually worked well at first. I just tried again and it's broken
now, the error message is similar to the one in my originat post and the
same happens whether I call cc or gcc.
It would seem so, yes. That suggests that the toolchain adjustment
stage didn't work correctly. Did the
Andrew Benton wrote:
Bhishma wrote:
Hi,
This is my first lfs install, and i am experiencing some problems.
I am trying to compile gcc (second pass) and it cannot found the
gnu/stub.h file.
Perhaps you mean gnu/stubs.h? It should have been installed as part of
glibc. It sounds like you
I did some tests and I find the results very strange.
Since the error message seemed to mean that gcc searched for ld-linux in
/tools/bin (in
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
warning: ld-linux.so.2, needed by /tools/lib/libc.so.6, not
Andrew Benton wrote:
Keith wrote:
Ran into some make check failures with Libtool-1.5.14. All tests
passed right up until the end...
FAIL: f77demo-static.test
SKIP: f77demo-make.test
SKIP: f77demo-exec.test
FAIL: f77demo-conf.test
SKIP: f77demo-make.test
SKIP: f77demo-exec.test
FAIL:
Bhishma wrote these words on 09/11/05 11:04 CST:
The version of the lfs guide is 6.1 (stable)
I also used binutils 2.16 instead of 2.15.92 because that one gave me
strange errors.
This makes no sense. LFS 6.1 stable calls for using 2.15.94.0.2.2
FBBG! :-)
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld
Andrew Benton wrote:
Torsten Vollmann wrote:
Hi.
I just compiled lfs from the latest live-cd. I deactivated loadable
module support in the kernel, but after rebooting realized that the
bootscripts need this option to be enabled because the hotplug script
runs scripts from inside the
Randy McMurchy:
Bhishma wrote these words on 09/11/05 11:04 CST:
The version of the lfs guide is 6.1 (stable)
I also used binutils 2.16 instead of 2.15.92 because that one gave me
strange errors.
This makes no sense. LFS 6.1 stable calls for using 2.15.94.0.2.2
FBBG! :-)
--
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Christopher Beppler wrote these words on 09/11/05 07:59 CST:
if I remove the .firefox, .thunderbird and .mozilla-dirs I cannot start
again, because the ugly segfault problem. What should I do?
If it were me, I'd remove every trace of firefox from your system,
Greetings,
I'm starting out with an old Pentium 100MHz/40MB/20GB (a Fujitsu drive
with Ontrack overlay software) laptop that's fully supported under SuSE
Linux (the hardware, not KDE). This is my first time building a LFS.
I'm looking for a boot disk similar to a Windows 98 boot disk that
Christopher Reimer wrote:
Greetings,
Hi
I'm starting out with an old Pentium 100MHz/40MB/20GB (a Fujitsu drive
with Ontrack overlay software) laptop
I built a LFS system on a similar system about 3 years ago (LFS 3.3 if I
remember correctly) and it wasn't an enjoyable experience. It
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Christopher Reimer wrote:
Greetings,
I'm starting out with an old Pentium 100MHz/40MB/20GB (a Fujitsu drive with
Ontrack overlay software) laptop that's fully supported under SuSE Linux (the
hardware, not KDE). This is my first time building a LFS.
I'm unclear what
Keith wrote:
Gotten to section 6.54 setting up Shadow-4.0.9. The installation went
ok as far as I can tell and I went back and double-checked my commands
for configuring it after the make install. I got to the part where it
says to set the root password by typing passwd root. I was under the
On Sunday 11 September 2005 16:52, Christopher Reimer wrote:
Greetings,
I'm starting out with an old Pentium 100MHz/40MB/20GB (a Fujitsu drive
with Ontrack overlay software) laptop that's fully supported under SuSE
Linux (the hardware, not KDE). This is my first time building a LFS.
I'm
32 matches
Mail list logo
